Background: Many studies evaluating central nervous system (CNS) metastases in breast cancer (BC) combine germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers, limiting gene-specific interpretation. We evaluated gene-specific overall survival (OS) after CNS metastasis and time to CNS involvement. Methods: We retrospectively identified BC patients with confirmed CNS metastases (1995–2022) from the Medical University of Vienna and the kConFab consortium. Germline status was classified as gBRCA1 PV, gBRCA2 PV, or non-carrier. Primary endpoint was OS from CNS metastasis diagnosis; secondary endpoint was CNS metastasis-free interval from primary BC diagnosis. Kaplan–Meier/log-rank tests were used for group comparisons. Multivariable Cox models assessed OS in complete cases, stratified by molecular subtype and adjusted for prognostic factors. Sensitivity analyses included subtype-adjusted and time-period models. Results: Among 115 patients (gBRCA1 n = 32, gBRCA2 n = 18, and non-carriers n = 65), median OS differed by germline status (p = 0.019): 20.0 months (95% CI 6.7–60.0) for gBRCA2 versus 7.1 months (95% CI 3.7–10.0) for gBRCA1 and 7.6 months (95% CI 3.4–12.0) for non-carriers. In subtype-stratified analyses, gBRCA1 showed similar mortality to non-carriers (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.49–1.64, p = 0.730), while gBRCA2 showed a lower but non-significant hazard (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.18–1.25, p = 0.131). Median CNS metastasis-free interval was longer for gBRCA2 (8.4 years) versus gBRCA1 (3.0 years) and non-carriers (3.1 years; p = 0.020). Sensitivity analyses were consistent. Conclusions: gBRCA2 carriers demonstrated longer unadjusted OS after CNS metastasis and a longer CNS metastasis-free interval compared with gBRCA1 carriers and non-carriers. However, these associations were attenuated and not statistically significant after adjustment, and should therefore be interpreted as hypothesis-generating. These findings supports further investigation of gene-specific CNS disease trajectories in larger cohorts.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Decaminada et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69e07cc02f7e8953b7cbddd4 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18081240
Alice Decaminada
Raute Sunder-Plassmann
Weang-Kee Ho
Cancers
The University of Melbourne
Medical University of Vienna
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...