PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 18, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Operator Exclusions from Structural Admissibility in Effective Field Theory: Predictions Beyond Dimensional Analysis in the Quantized Dimensional Ledger

View Full Paper
JBJames D. Bourassa

Key Points

  • The aim is to define and prove an operator-exclusion theorem in effective field theory using a new framework.
  • Introduced a framework for Quantized Dimensional Ledger (QDL)
  • Defined a closure-frequency budget derived from dimensional targets
  • Proved the operator-exclusion theorem through explicit construction
  • Examined specific operator families for structural admissibility
  • Demonstrated that certain operators, while dimensionally legal, exceed closure-frequency budget, making them inadmissible.
  • Showed that specific SMEFT deformations lose structural generality under certain closure assignments.

Abstract

Ordinary dimensional analysis is a necessary but permissive constraint on effective field theory: it enforces dimensional homogeneity but does not by itself determine whether a symmetry-allowed operator is structurally admissible. This paper introduces a minimal formal framework for a Quantized Dimensional Ledger (QDL) approach and defines a closure-frequency budget derived from an action-compatible dimensional target. Within this setting, an operator-exclusion theorem is proved by explicit construction. The family (∂nF) 2 (^nF) ² (∂nF) 2 is dimensionally legal in ordinary effective field theory after suppression by powers of a heavy scale, but it exceeds the closure-frequency budget for every n≥1n 1n≥1 and is therefore structurally inadmissible. A second worked example shows that the standard SMEFT deformation OHWBO₇ₖ₁OHWB becomes structurally non-generic under one natural closure assignment, requiring coefficient support that is not supplied by generic effective-field-theory scaling. These results establish that structural admissibility can yield exclusion criteria beyond ordinary dimensional analysis and provide a concrete falsifiability condition: if nature robustly requires support in a sector excluded by closure, the closure hypothesis fails in that domain.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

James D. Bourassa (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e320cc40886becb653feb9https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19617280
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper