Racial/ethnic minority enrollment in oncological therapeutic clinical trials (TCT) remains low. Thus, we explored whether TCTs’ restrictiveness enrollment criteria and phase were associated with racial/ethnic minority enrollment. We analyzed cross-sectional (2016–2023) enrollment data and protocols from oncology TCTs completed at a large urban medical research institution. Two reviewers assessed eligibility restrictiveness using ASCO and Friends of Cancer Research recommendations. Trials received a score (0–8) based on criteria related to brain metastases, infectious diseases (HIV, hepatitis B/C), organ dysfunction (cardiac, liver, kidney), and prior or concurrent malignancies; those with scores above the 75th percentile were classified as restrictive (score > 4). Trial phase was categorized as early (I/II) or late (III/IV). Participants (n = 876) from 144 TCTs were classified as minority (Hispanic, Black, American Indian/Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander) or non-minority per NIH definitions. Multivariable Poisson GEE models, adjusting for age, sex, trial timing relative to ASCO/Friends recommendations, and sponsor type, explore these associations. Completed TCTs were most restrictive in excluding patients with a prior or concurrent malignancy(73%), HIV(59%), and/or liver dysfunction(53%). Of the 876 trial participants, 32% were racial/ethnic minorities, and only 17% were enrolled in restrictive TCTs. Restrictive TCTs had 45%(RR = 0.55, 95%CI = 0.3–0.98) and early-phase TCTs had 52%(RR = 0.48, 95%CI = 0.30–0.77) lower risk of enrolling racial/ethnic minority participants compared to standard and later-phase TCTs, respectively. TCT studies with restrictive enrollment eligibility criteria and early-phase studies were less likely to enroll racial/ethnic minority participants. Underscoring that enrollment eligibility criteria is a barrier that may hinder minority enrollment.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Angel Arizpe
J. Nieva
Trevor A. Pickering
BMC Cancer
University of Southern California
Wayne State University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Arizpe et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69e473bd010ef96374d8f899 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-026-16016-z
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: