PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 23, 2016Journal of the American Heart Association147 citationsOpen Access

Impairment of Coronary Flow Reserve Evaluated by Phase Contrast Cine‐Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

View Full Paper
SKShingo KatoNSNaka SaitoHKHidekuni Kirigaya

Structured PICO

Is coronary flow reserve, evaluated by phase contrast cine-MRI, impaired in patients with HFpEF compared to hypertensive LVH and controls?

P
Population
56 subjects including 25 patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (mean age 73±7 years), 13 with hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) (mean age 67±10 years), and 18 controls (mean age 65±15 years).
I
Intervention
Phase contrast cine-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the coronary sinus at rest and during ATP infusion to assess coronary flow reserve (CFR).
C
Comparator
Hypertensive LVH patients and healthy controls.
O
Outcome
Coronary flow reserve (CFR) calculated as coronary sinus blood flow during ATP infusion divided by coronary sinus blood flow at rest.surrogate

Coronary flow reserve is significantly impaired in HFpEF patients compared to those with hypertensive LVH and healthy controls, suggesting microvascular dysfunction is a key pathophysiological factor in HFpEF.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Phase contrast (PC) cine-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the coronary sinus allows for noninvasive evaluation of coronary flow reserve (CFR), which is an index of left ventricular microvascular function. The objective of this study was to investigate coronary flow reserve in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 25 patients with HFpEF (mean and SD of age: 73±7 years), 13 with hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) (67±10 years), and 18 controls (65±15 years). Breath-hold PC cine-MRI images of the coronary sinus were obtained to assess blood flow at rest and during ATP infusion. CFR was calculated as coronary sinus blood flow during ATP infusion divided by coronary sinus blood flow at rest. Impairment of CFR was defined as CFR <2.5 according to a previous study. The majority (76%) of HFpEF patients had decreased CFR. CFR was significantly decreased in HFpEF patients in comparison to hypertensive LVH patients and control subjects (CFR: 2.21±0.55 in HFpEF vs 3.05±0.74 in hypertensive LVH, 3.83±0.73 in controls; P<0.001 by 1-way ANOVA). According to multivariable linear regression analysis, CFR independently and significantly correlated with serum brain natriuretic peptide level (β=-68.0; 95% CI, -116.2 to -19.7; P=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: CFR was significantly lower in patients with HFpEF than in hypertensive LVH patients and controls. These results indicated that impairment of CFR might be a pathophysiological factor for HFpEF and might be related to HFpEF disease severity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kato et al. (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fbd6dddf6507d4845ddb31https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.115.002649
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper