Does bridging therapy with intravenous thrombolysis improve 3-month functional independency in acute ischemic stroke patients on DOACs undergoing endovascular thrombectomy?
1,991 acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients on direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) undergoing endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) from the SITS international Treatment registry. Propensity score matched cohort included 881 patients (median age 76, median NIHSS 16-17).
Bridging therapy (intravenous thrombolysis prior to endovascular thrombectomy)
Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) alone
3-month functional independency (modified Rankin scale 0-2)hard clinical
In acute ischemic stroke patients on DOACs, bridging intravenous thrombolysis before endovascular thrombectomy appears safe and yields similar functional outcomes compared to EVT alone.
Abstract Background and aims The necessity of bridging endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) has been questioned. Recent observational studies suggest that IVT is safe in AIS patients on direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC). We aimed to investigate the risk-benefit of bridging therapy in AIS patients on DOAC. Methods We used the SITS international Treatment registry to include AIS patients on DOAC that received EVT. We compared bridging therapy with EVT alone using propensity score matching (PSM). Primary outcome was 3-month functional independency (modified Rankin scale 0-2). Secondary outcomes were symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH) per SITS-MOST definition and death by 3 months. We performed explorative multivariate regression of quadratically modelled imaging-to-groin time, investigating any cut-offs for functional independence. Results Of 1,991 DOAC treated EVT patients, 317 received IVT. After PSM, we included 294 bridging therapy patients and 587 EVT only patients. After PSM, the groups were well balanced for baseline and demographic characteristics (median NIHSS 17 vs. 16, age 76 and onset to imaging time 99 min in both groups). There were no statistically significant differences in functional independence (36% vs. 35%), SICH (1.5% vs. 2.2%) and mortality (34% vs. 30%) between bridging and EVT only. Explorative analyses found imaging-to-groin time within 66 min favors EVT only while imaging-to-groin time beyond 185 min favors bridging. Conclusions We found no differences in safety and outcomes between bridging therapy and EVT only in AIS patients on DOAC. Explorative analyses suggesting shorter imaging-to-groin times favor direct EVT while longer times favor bridging. Conflict of interest Marius Matusevicius: Nothing to disclose. Ana Paiva Nunes: Nothing to disclose. Andrea Zini: Nothing to disclose. Guido Bigliardi: Nothing to disclose. André Peeters: Nothing to disclose. Danilo Toni: Nothing to disclose. Niaz Ahmed: Nothing to disclose.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Marius Matusevicius
Ana Paiva Nunes
Andrea Zini
European Stroke Journal
Karolinska Institutet
Sapienza University of Rome
Karolinska University Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Matusevicius et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7eb0bfa21ec5bbf06ec8 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.613