Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to identify the relative importance of four main attributes of food products for consumer’s choice. These are price, taste, environmental friendliness and healthfulness, tested across hedonic and utilitarian food products (milk and ice-cream). The weighting of attributes involved in food choices is a complex phenomenon, as consumers must consider contradictory requirements when making their choices. Consumers’ decision-making processes might also be influenced by food category. Some food products are mostly consumed for pleasure, whereas others are consumed because of their nutritional value. Design/methodology/approach – The study employs a choice-based conjoint technique, which addresses how consumers make trade-offs across a set of product attributes. Findings – The results indicate that price and taste attributes are rated as the most important for both hedonic and utilitarian food products. However, when the authors group consumers according to their product preferences, the relative importance of product attributes changes. Specifically, the importance of environmental friendliness and healthfulness is much higher among the health-conscious and environmentally conscious segments than for other segments. Originality/value – To the knowledge, this is the first study comparing the importance of this combination of product attributes (price, taste, calorie content and eco-label) across hedonic and utilitarian foods in a choice-based conjoint setting. Moreover, a new way of grouping consumers according to their ethical-value profiles enables the authors to create a psychographic description of these segments, and to relate it to their food attribute preferences.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Natalia Mæhle
Nina M. Iversen
Leif E. Hem
British Food Journal
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Norwegian School of Economics
BI Norwegian Business School
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Mæhle et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69ff97dfef8139f8ff776732 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/bfj-04-2015-0148
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: