Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
PURPOSE: -mutant metastatic melanoma. METHODS: -mutant melanoma from 37 sites in nine countries were randomly assigned to arm A (encorafenib 450 mg orally once daily plus binimetinib 45 mg orally twice daily until progressive disease PD -> ipilimumab plus nivolumab ipilimumab 3 mg/kg once every 3 weeks and nivolumab 1 mg/kg once every 3 weeks × four cycles -> nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks), arm B ipilimumab plus nivolumab until PD -> encorafenib plus binimetinib, or arm C (encorafenib plus binimetinib for 8 weeks -> ipilimumab plus nivolumab until PD -> encorafenib plus binimetinib). The primary end point was overall survival (OS) at 2 years. Secondary end points included total progression-free survival, 3-year OS, best overall response rate, duration of response, and biomarkers in the intent-to-treat population. Safety was analyzed throughout sequential treatment in all participants who received at least one dose of study medication. RESULTS: A total of 209 patients were randomly assigned (69 in arm A, 71 in arm B, and 69 in arm C). At a median follow-up of 32.2 (interquartile range, 27.9-41.6) months, median OS was not reached in any arm and more than 30 patients were alive in all arms. Assuming a null hypothesis of median OS of ≤ 15 months, the OS end point was met for all arms. The 2-year and 3-year OS rates were 65% (95% CI, 54 to 76) and 54% (95% CI, 41 to 67) in arm A, 73% (95% CI, 62 to 84) and 62% (95% CI, 48 to 76) in arm B, and 69% (95% CI, 59 to 80) and 60% (95% CI, 58 to 72) in arm C. No new safety signals emerged. CONCLUSION: -mutant melanoma.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Paolo A. Ascierto
Mario Mandalà
Pier Francesco Ferrucci
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Karolinska Institutet
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico
Karolinska University Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ascierto et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69ffb73c2ff633f36577a865 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.21.02961
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: