Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
BACKGROUND the ORR was 14.1%, and the median PFS and OS were 3.8 and 10.6 months, respectively, with a median follow-up duration of 39.6 months. The efficacy outcomes were not significantly different between patients who received sorafenib and those who received cytotoxic chemotherapy (ORR, 9.7% vs 21.6%, P = .14; median PFS, 4.2 vs 2.9 months, P = .52; median OS, 10.7 vs 10.6 months, P = .34). In multivariate analysis, large intrahepatic tumour burden (≥30% of liver volume), elevated serum bilirubin and non-platinum containing first-line chemotherapy remained as significant prognostic factors for poorer OS. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy outcomes according to first-line treatment were not significantly different between sorafenib and cytotoxic chemotherapy, and pathological findings were not found to help for determining appropriate therapeutic agent or assessing the prognosis. To overcome the poor treatment outcomes, further studies are needed to find proper treatment targets, biomarkers and the best treatment strategies.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kim et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a024bde2e6b593cd375ffbe — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/liv.14813
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
Eo Jin Kim
Changhoon Yoo
Hyo Jeong Kang
Liver International
University of Ulsan
Asan Medical Center
Ulsan College
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...