Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
ABSTRACT This study examined the impact of Continuous Professional Development (CPD) on instructional quality in secondary education classrooms, drawing on student perceptions from Grade 8 to 12 learners ( N = 250) at Hangzhou No. 14 High School, China. Using a structured 25‐item questionnaire administered via Google Forms, data were collected across four CPD dimensions—training, mentoring and feedback, assessment practices, and reflective practice—and analysed through descriptive statistics, one‐way ANOVA, multiple regression, and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) using SPSS. Findings revealed moderate student agreement that CPD positively influences instructional quality, with training and lesson planning receiving the highest ratings. ANOVA indicated no statistically significant variation in perceptions across student age groups, suggesting CPD impact is perceived consistently regardless of age. Multiple regression results showed that no single CPD component significantly predicted instructional quality in isolation, pointing to the interdependent nature of professional development practices. EFA confirmed a multidimensional CPD structure across 10 latent factors. The findings also underscore how targeted training and accessibility measures can empower inclusive e‐learning for students with disabilities. These findings underscore the need for integrated, context‐responsive CPD frameworks that prioritize mentoring and reflective practice to produce sustained improvements in classroom instruction.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Suping Li
Yao Zhao
Lili Hu
European Journal of Education
Hunan University of Science and Technology
Shenzhen Polytechnic
Guangdong University Of Finances and Economics
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Li et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a06b81ce7dec685947aaa41 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70630
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: