Does the 2025 ASE classification of LVDD improve identification and maintain prognostic value for major adverse cardiovascular events compared to the 2016 classification in a community cohort?
1,953 participants from the Project Baseline Health Study who underwent comprehensive transthoracic echocardiography
Classification of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) using the 2025 American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) recommendations (evaluating both fixed and age-specific thresholds)
Classification of LVDD using the 2016 ASE recommendations
Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) over a median follow-up of 4.3 yearshard clinical
The updated 2025 ASE guidelines for LVDD successfully eliminate indeterminate classifications, identify more affected individuals in the community, and maintain independent prognostic value for major adverse cardiovascular events.
BACKGROUND: The 2016 American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) guidelines for left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) classification resulted in a significant proportion of indeterminate classifications and grades. To address these limitations and incorporate new evidence, the ASE updated its recommendations in 2025. The impact of these revisions in community cohorts remains unclear. METHODS: We studied 1953 Project Baseline Health Study participants who underwent comprehensive transthoracic echocardiography. LVDD was classified using the 2016 and 2025 ASE recommendations. For the 2025 recommendations, fixed and age-specific thresholds were evaluated separately. We compared LVDD prevalence, reclassification patterns, associations with cardiovascular risk factors, and prognostic value for major adverse cardiovascular events over a median follow-up of 4.3 years. RESULTS: =0.02). Major adverse cardiovascular events occurred in 98 (5.0%) participants over the follow-up period. LVDD by all classification approaches was independently associated with major adverse cardiovascular events after adjustment for baseline risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: The 2025 ASE recommendations identified more participants with LVDD than the 2016 algorithm without indeterminate classification or grading. LVDD by the 2025 classification was significantly associated with major adverse cardiovascular events, supporting the clinical relevance of the revised framework.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Nancy Herrera-Leaño
Bettia Celestin
Everton Santana
Circulation Cardiovascular Imaging
Stanford University
Duke University
KU Leuven
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Herrera-Leaño et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a07ebcd686e45fdbcfe095e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/circimaging.125.019402