PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 5, 20250 citationsOpen Access

From Catharsis to Critical Discourse: Theatre’s Role in Modern Western Democracy

View Full Paper
RRRachel Rusonik

Key Points

  • Theatre serves as a vital tool for encouraging political participation, effectively promoting engagement among audiences.
  • In examining productions like The Assembly and The Other Shore, the study highlights how theatre can challenge democratic structures.
  • The paper argues that the communal experience provided by theatre can enhance the principles of equality and multivocality in democracy.
  • As a reflection of historical practices, theatre remains crucial for fostering active discourse in contemporary representative democracies.

Abstract

The often cried lament “Democracy is dead!” has been heard again with a new intensity following the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election. Yet in Western representative democracy, political participation has already been largely reduced to only episodic elections, leaving citizens disconnected from most decision-making. In contrast, theatre and its live communal nature acts as a vessel for inspiring direct engagement, uniting audiences through common embodied experiences. This paper examines the enduring relationship between theatre and democracy, arguing that performance remains a crucial forum for exploring three key democratic tenets: multivocality, political participation, and equality—all integral to any genuine democracy. By drawing on Greek history, politics, and theatre theorists, as well as two contemporary theatre case studies, Porte Parole’s The Assembly and The DAN School’s The Other Shore, this study explores how theatre has functioned as a democratic tool in Western society since Ancient Greece, where tragedy fostered and cathartically resolved collective concerns in the theatre space, to modern productions that prompt active political discourse. The Assembly, a verbatim documentary theatre piece, mirrors representative democracy by staging condensed pre-recorded political conversations, then briefly allowing audience participation before cutting it off, highlighting unsettling systematic limitations. The Other Shore examines the dangers of groupthink under direct democracy through ensemble storytelling and abstraction, with audiences facing each other, provoking interpretation, critical reflection, and dialogue when exiting the space. Both productions strategically incite the questioning of rigid democratic structures. This paper argues that theatre’s liveness—its ability to create diverse ephemeral communal spaces—offers a key alternative to the fragmented nature of representative democracy. In a time of staunch polarization and disengagement, theatre remains a vital democratic tool that disrupts passive spectatorship.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rachel Rusonik (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68bb421a2b87ece8dc95883ahttps://doi.org/10.24908/iqurcp19069
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1In The Lurch: Verbatim Theater and the Crisis of Democratic Deliberation by Ryan Claycomb (review)2024
  2. 2Political theatre: an application of its principles1992
  3. 3Living Citizenship through Popular Theatre, Process Drama and Playbuilding2001 · 1 citations
  4. 4Can Theatre Change Lives and Impact Underserved Communities?2016
  5. 5Community, Chorality, and the Global Experience. Conceptualizing the Collective ‘We’ on Stage2026