PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2025International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences0 citationsOpen Access

A Queer Feminist Reading of Women in Love by D.H. Lawrence: Lesbian Desire and Psychological Turmoil

View Full Paper
BGBedse Sunita GauramMDManohar D. Dugaje

Key Points

  • The presence of latent lesbian desire in the female relationships of Women in Love challenges conventional masculinity, while highlighting emotional turmoil.
  • Lawrence's depiction of Gudrun's connection to Ursula and attraction to Loerke suggests a rejection of hetero-normative expectations and relationships.
  • The study utilizes theories of homosocial desire and compulsory heterosexuality to reframe Gudrun's psychological struggles as suppressed lesbian potential.
  • The narrative underscores the conflict between queer female subjectivity and the constraints of male-dominated storytelling in early 20th-century literature.

Abstract

In Women in Love, D. H. Lawrence entwined the lives of two sisters, Ursula and Gudrun Brangwen, and their relationships with two men, Rupert Birkin and Gerald Crich, where Lawrence explores the intricacies of love and human relationships in Women in Love. The story revolves around themes of desire, existential reflection, and the fight for individual individuality in romantic relationships and is set in early 20th-century England. Through a queer feminist lens, this essay examines the psychological agony and latent lesbian desire in D.H. Lawrence's Women in Love (1920). It contends that an undercurrent of same-sex desire suppressed by hetero-normative patriarchy is shown in Lawrence's depiction of female relationships, especially that of Gudrun Brangwen. Gudrun's strong emotional connection to her sister Ursula and her attraction to the feminine sculptor Loerke imply an implicit rejection of conventional male-dominated relationships, even as her hostile relationship with Gerald Crich devolves into violence and emotional collapse. Based on Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick's theories on homosocial desire and Adrienne Rich's concept of ‘compulsory heterosexuality,’ this study reinterprets Gudrun's psychological struggle and emotional separation as manifestations of suppressed lesbian potential rather than pathology. In the end, the book becomes a place of conflict between queer female subjectivity and male-centered narrative control.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gauram et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1d24654b1d3bfb60f83c2https://doi.org/10.22161/ijels.104.81
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper