PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 13, 2024Annals of Surgery7 citationsOpen Access

Benefits of Aerosolized, Point-of-care, Autologous Skin Cell Suspension (ASCS) for the Closure of full Thickness Wounds from Thermal and Non-Thermal Causes

View Full Paper
CHC. Scott HultmanUAUrsula AdamsCRCorianne Rogers

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the utility of Autologous Skin Cell Suspension (ASCS) in closing full-thickness (FT) defects from injury and infection. Summary Background Data: Although ASCS has documented success in closing partial-thickness burns, far less is known about the efficacy of ASCS in FT defects. Methods: Fifty consecutive patients with FT defects (burn 17, necrotizing infection 13, crush 7, degloving 5, other 8) underwent closure with the bilayer technique of 3:1 widely-meshed, thin, split-thickness skin graft and 80:1 expanded ASCS. End points were limb salvage rate, donor site reduction, operative and hospital throughput, incidence of complications, and re-epithelialization by 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Results: Definitive wound closure was achieved in 76%, 94%, and 98% of patients, at 4, 8, and 12 weeks, respectively. Limb salvage occurred in 42/43 patients (10 upper, 33 lower extremities). Mean area grafted was 435 cm2; donor site size was 212 cm2, representing a potential reduction of 50%. Mean surgical time was 71 minutes; total OR time was 124 minutes. Mean length-of-stay was 26.4 days; time from grafting to discharge was 11.2 days. 4/50 patients (8%) required 6 reoperations for bleeding (1), breakdown (4), and amputation (1). 4/50 patients (8%) developed hypertrophic scarring, which responded to silicone sheeting (2) and laser resurfacing (2). Mean follow-up was 92.7 days. Conclusion: When used for closure of FT wounds, point-of-care ASCS is effective and safe. Benefits include rapid re-epithelialization, high rate of limb salvage, reduction of donor site size and morbidity, and low incidence of hypertrophic scarring.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hultman et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e64e7db6db6435875deff8https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000006387
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper