PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 25, 2011PLoS Medicine923 citationsOpen Access

Using the Delphi Technique to Determine Which Outcomes to Measure in Clinical Trials: Recommendations for the Future Based on a Systematic Review of Existing Studies

View Full Paper
ISIan SinhaRSRosalind L SmythPWPaula Williamson

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Ian Sinha and colleagues advise that when using the Delphi process to develop core outcome sets for clinical trials, patients and clinicians be involved, researchers and facilitators avoid imposing their views on participants, and attrition of participants be minimized.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sinha et al. (2011) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/696a9b712a89dc55901ff0cahttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000393
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Outcomes in Clinical Trials of Inhaled Corticosteroids for Children with Asthma Are Narrowly Focussed on Short Term Disease Activity2009 · 60 citations
  2. 2Preliminary core sets of measures for disease activity and damage assessment in juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus and juvenile dermatomyositis2003 · 233 citations
  3. 3Participants' response to the Delphi method: An attitudinal perspective1984 · 158 citations
  4. 4Patient-Important Outcomes in Registered Diabetes Trials2008 · 255 citations
  5. 5Assessing unidimensionality: A comparison of Rasch Modeling, Parallel Analysis, and TETRAD2020 · 628 citations