PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 6, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Flow Behavior analysis over the NACA 4412 airfoil at Different angles of attack

HHHakim El HoujajiAMAhmed El MimouniKMKhalid Mrigua

Key Points

  • This research aims to analyze the aerodynamic behavior of the NACA 4412 airfoil at various angles of attack.
  • Utilized numerical analysis to examine flow behavior over the airfoil
  • Measured lift coefficient and drag coefficient at different angles of attack
  • Analyzed air pressure and speed variations over the airfoil
  • Lift coefficient increases with the angle of attack up to 14°.
  • Significant stall occurs past 14°, leading to reduced lift due to recirculation and turbulence.
  • Flow adheres well to the airfoil's profile at low angles of attack.

Abstract

To design and optimize wings, rotor blades and aircraft, it is essential to have a good understanding of the aerodynamic properties of the wing. The aim of this numerical study is to examine and analyze the aerodynamic characteristics of a NACA4412 airfoil at different angles of attack, to capture the lift coefficient, drag coefficient and flow separation. The numerical results provide the variation of air pressure and speed when moving over the airfoil for different angles. We found that increasing the angle of attack increases the lift coefficient. At low angles of attack, the area adheres well to the profile, but beyond 14°, a significant stall occurs in the upper surface flow, forming a large recirculation and turbulence zone, which explains the sudden decrease in the lift coefficient from this angle. This study provides vital information on the aerodynamic performance characteristics of the NACA 4412 airfoil, which may be useful for the design of wind turbine blades, aircraft wings, and drones.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Houjaji et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698585ea8f7c464f23009bbfhttps://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202635001007/pdf
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper