PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 13, 2026Current Oncology0 citationsOpen Access

Efficacy of Lenvatinib as Second-Line Therapy After Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

View Full Paper
DTDaichi TakizawaHAHirotaka AraiMSMitsuhiko Shibasaki

Key Points

  • To evaluate the efficacy of lenvatinib as a second-line therapy following atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.
  • Retrospective analysis of 165 patients treated with ATZ/BEV for unresectable HCC.
  • Comparison between patients receiving lenvatinib as second-line (n=49) and those who did not (n=95).
  • Exclusion of patients with insufficient follow-up to ensure reliable outcome assessment.
  • Median overall survival was significantly longer in the LEN group (20.9 months) compared to the non-LEN group (8.47 months, p < 0.01).
  • LEN administration correlated with improved overall survival (hazard ratio 0.48).
  • The benefit of LEN persisted after adjustments, showing an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.50.
  • Independent prognostic factors included a lower albumin-bilirubin score and total LEN dose ≥ 400 mg.

Abstract

Background: Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (ATZ/BEV) is widely used as first-line therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however, optimal subsequent treatment after ATZ/BEV failure remains unclear. Methods: Between October 2020 and August 2024, 165 patients with unresectable HCC treated with first-line ATZ/BEV were retrospectively analyzed. After excluding patients with insufficient follow-up, outcomes were compared between those who received lenvatinib (LEN) as second-line therapy (n = 49) and those who did not (n = 95). Results: Median overall survival (OS) was significantly longer in the LEN group than in the non-LEN group (20.9 vs. 8.47 months, p < 0.01). LEN administration was independently associated with improved OS (hazard ratio 0.48), and this benefit remained significant after inverse probability weighting adjustment (adjusted hazard ratio 0.50). Among LEN-treated patients, a lower albumin–bilirubin score before ATZ/BEV and a total LEN dose ≥ 400 mg were independent prognostic factors. Conclusions: Lenvatinib as second-line therapy after ATZ/BEV was associated with improved survival in unresectable HCC. Preservation of liver function and the ability to maintain adequate lenvatinib exposure were associated with favorable outcomes, likely reflecting baseline prognosis and treatment feasibility rather than lenvatinib-specific predictive factors.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Takizawa et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b3acf302a1e69014ccf2a2https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol33030159
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Lenvatinib as Second-Line Treatment after Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Clinical Results Show Importance of Hepatic Reserve Function2023 · 36 citations
  2. 2MAFLD: A Consensus-Driven Proposed Nomenclature for Metabolic Associated Fatty Liver Disease2020 · 3,348 citations
  3. 3Global Burden of 5 Major Types of Gastrointestinal Cancer2020 · 2,042 citations
  4. 4EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD)2024 · 454 citations
  5. 5Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma *2005 · 5,898 citations