PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 18, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Before You Decide: The Decision Series — Ten Papers on Artificial Intelligence for People Who Have to Decide

View Full Paper
AKAhn Kyungae

Key Points

  • The goal is to analyze common limitations in defining artificial intelligence and its impact on decision-making.
  • Collected ten papers presenting foundational definitions and their limitations.
  • Used bibliometric analysis and CKA measurements to establish cross-disciplinary insights.
  • Developed new concepts through tool-inversion and structural incompatibility analyses.
  • Introduced empirical components like cross-model representational analysis.
  • Identified a unified account of AI through enhancements in foundational definitions.
  • Demonstrated that every human is crucial in the AI development pipeline.
  • Showed Earth's physical processes can support AI computational needs.

Abstract

This volume collects ten papers arguing that four foundational definitions — of intelligence, AI, the robot, and the Silicon Era — share a common structural limitation and that completing them produces a unified account of what this technological transition is. Papers 1–3 establish the foundation: a deficiency-substrate account of human cognition, empirical evidence for disciplinary convergence under AI methodology (CKA measurements, bibliometric analysis, 2024 Nobel confirmations), and a formalization of connective abduction as research methodology. Papers 4–6 develop the definition arc: a tool-inversion analysis of AI, the structural incompatibility of human-centered workflows with AI capability, and a proof that every human is structurally priceless to the AI pipeline. Papers 7–9 develop the robot arc: Distributed Agency Computation, the carbon-silicon substrate competition, and World Signal Sufficiency — the thesis that Earth's physically governed signal flows constitute a sufficient computational environment for AI. Paper 10 closes the arc with the Definitional Cascade and a redefinition of the Silicon Era as the age of planetary computation. The series introduces thirty-two original concepts in a published dependency architecture. Empirical components include cross-model representational analysis, bibliometric phase-transition data, and proposed experimental designs. Revision Note: - Paper 5 (TAP): Corrected McKinsey (2025) figures throughout — adoption rate updated from 78% to 88%; "over 80% report no measurable performance improvement" corrected to "only 39% report any enterprise-level EBIT impact." Seven instances corrected including subtitle, abstract, Section 1.1, Section 1.2, Controls, and Section 5.- Paper 8 (Thermodynamic Wall): Same McKinsey correction applied (1 instance).- Original figures were derived from secondary interpretations and did not match the McKinsey primary source (The State of AI, November 2025).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ahn Kyungae (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ba424e4e9516ffd37a27b1https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19050836
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Before You Decide: The Decision Series — Ten Papers on Artificial Intelligence for People Who Have to Decide2026
  2. 2The Decalogy on Artificial Intelligence: Ten Papers in Four Movements2026
  3. 3The Next Experiment: The Research Discussion Series2026
  4. 4The Silicon Era: The Definitional Cascade, the Independence Illusion, and the Convergence of Ten Arguments2026
  5. 5The Decalogy Explained: A Non-Specialist Guide to Ten Papers on Artificial Intelligence2026