PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 24, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Directional Density of Gases Under FitzGerald-Lorentz Contraction: Predictions for Rotating Optical Interferometers

View Full Paper
AJAlvydas Jakeliunas

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore how FitzGerald-Lorentz contraction affects gas density in rotating systems and predict observable outcomes.
  • Analyzing effects of FitzGerald-Lorentz contraction on gas behavior during rotation
  • Calculating anisotropic collision cross-sections of molecules in static gas
  • Modeling density distributions in continually rotating optical interferometers
  • Gas density remains isotropic under rotation, whereas solid density is anisotropic
  • A measurable fringe shift is predicted due to the anisotropic response in solids
  • Null results are expected in solid-dielectric interferometers and static gas setups

Abstract

In Lorentz Ether Theory, FitzGerald-Lorentz contraction affects all matter — containers, molecules, and the electromagnetic interactions between them. In a static gas, the anisotropic collision cross-sections of contracted molecules drive the density distribution toward the same anisotropy as in a solid, restoring the SR/LET equivalence. However, this equilibration proceeds at the diffusion timescale τdiff ~ L²/D — hundreds to thousands of seconds for a laboratory gas cell. In a continuously rotating experiment with period Tᵣot ~ 5–60 s, the anisotropy cannot keep pace with the changing contraction direction: the gas density remains isotropic while the solid tracks the contraction instantaneously. This timescale separation creates a measurable difference: the directional density of a gas (molecules per unit length) is isotropic, while that of a solid is anisotropic. The resulting fringe shift on rotation is ΔN = k (L/2λ) (n−1) (v/c) ², where k is the number of passes. The signal should depend on rotation speed — a direct, falsifiable prediction unique to this mechanism. We predict null results for solid-dielectric interferometers and for static (non-rotating) gas experiments.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Alvydas Jakeliunas (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c229b2aeb5a845df0d47fchttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19159689
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Directional Density of Gases Under FitzGerald–Lorentz Contraction: Statistical Relaxation and Predictions for Optical Interferometry2026
  2. 2Lorentz γ from Foam Wave Kinematics: A Coordinate Substitution and its Corollaries2026
  3. 3Gravity as Hydrodynamics: Gradient-Index Refraction in a Variable-Density Ether Plenum2026
  4. 4Characterization of rarefied gas flows within narrow-confined spaces in grating interferometers2025 · 2 citations
  5. 5A Generalized Contraction Framework for the Michelson-Morley Null Result in a Medium-Based Theory2025