The article examines the relationship between legal language and the legal worldview as interconnected elements in the doctrinal reproduction of legal reality. It argues that legal language functions not merely as a vehicle for recording normative prescriptions, but also as a mechanism for selecting legally relevant meaning, shaping standards of legal argumentation, and fixing the boundaries of legal thinking, thereby determining the disciplinary capacities of the theory of state and law and its place within the system of legal sciences. The study further shows that critical jurisprudence may be conceptualized as a model focused on the analysis of legal language, legal discourse, and legal texts in their cultural-historical embeddedness, including the identification of value-based premises and latent modes of legitimation of the legal order. Particular attention is given to transboundary legal contexts, where the precision of legal formulations and the predictability of procedures acquire independent normative significance for legal certainty and the stability of legal regimes. The conclusion emphasizes that the development of legal scholarship requires a responsible renewal of its conceptual apparatus while preserving doctrinal criteria of continuity.
Sergey Nikolaevich Khrameshin (2018) studied this question.