PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 7, 2026The Astrophysical Journal0 citationsOpen Access

Obscured AGN at z < 1.5: X-Ray to Far-infrared SEDs and Host Galaxy Morphologies in the GOODS Fields

View Full Paper
WJWilliam W.H. JarvisCAConnor AugeDSDavid Sanders

Key Points

  • The aim is to analyze obscured active galactic nuclei (AGN) in terms of their spectral energy distributions and host galaxy morphologies.
  • Analyzed 194 X-ray luminous AGN with redshifts less than 1.5.
  • Generated spectral energy distributions (SEDs) from X-ray to far-infrared.
  • Classified host galaxy morphologies visually using Galaxy Shapes of Light software.
  • 94% of AGN showed obscured SEDs with diminished UV and/or mid-IR emission.
  • Only 6% exhibited unobscured, quasar-like SEDs.
  • A significant number of galaxies were found to have post-merger spheroid morphologies associated with obscured AGN.

Abstract

Abstract We present an analysis of spectral energy distributions (SEDs), galaxy light profiles, and visual morphological classifications for 194 X-ray luminous active galactic nuclei (AGN) (intrinsic absorption-corrected log ( L X , 0.5 − 7 keV ) > 42.5 ( maximum 45.2 ) erg s − 1 ) with z < 1.5 in the Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey (GOODS) fields. We generate X-ray to far-infrared SEDs normalized at 1 μ m for all AGN and sort them according to their emission slopes in the ultraviolet (UV) and infrared (IR). We visually classify their host galaxies’ morphologies and compute their bulge/total light ratios using the Galaxy Shapes of Light ( galight ) software. Most (94%) GOODS AGN exhibit obscured (i.e., diminished UV and/or mid-IR emission) SEDs. Only 6% show unobscured, quasar-like SEDs. Secular processes appear to play a large role in stimulating AGN emission, since only ∼1/3 of galaxies are undergoing interactions. We also describe the morphological identification of a population of suspected postmerger spheroid galaxies with obscured UV/IR SEDs and distinguish them from the host galaxies of AGN with less obscuration in the UV or IR.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jarvis et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d49ecbb33cc4c35a227739https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ae40b4
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1AGN obscuration in optical and X-rays: Host properties and the interplay of nuclear and galactic gas and dust in a combined SDSS–XMM sample2026
  2. 2X-ray spectral properties of dust-obscured galaxies in the XMM-SERVS coverage of the XMM-LSS field2024 · 4 citations
  3. 3The incidence of X-ray AGN and non-AGN galaxies in the far-infrared: Insights into host galaxy properties and AGN obscuration2025
  4. 4X-ray spectral properties of dust-obscured galaxies in the XMM-SERVS coverage of the XMM-LSS field2024
  5. 5Accretion properties of X-ray AGN: evidence for radiation-regulated obscuration with redshift-dependent host galaxy contribution2024 · 5 citations