PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 7, 2015BMJ4,304 citationsOpen Access

Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement

GCGary S. CollinsJRJohannes B. ReitsmaDADouglas G. Altman

Key Points

  • The aim is to enhance transparency in reporting prediction model studies to mitigate bias and improve usefulness.
  • Developed recommendations through a literature review and web-based survey.
  • Refined checklist of 22 essential items during meetings with methodologists and healthcare professionals.
  • Promoted the use of the TRIPOD statement alongside an explanation and elaboration document.
  • The TRIPOD Statement created a detailed checklist to standardize reporting of prediction model studies.
  • The checklist is designed to improve clarity and assessability of bias in reporting.
  • The article and the TRIPOD Statement are available for free access in various esteemed medical journals.

Abstract

Prediction models are developed to aid health care providers in estimating the probability or risk that a specific disease or condition is present (diagnostic models) or that a specific event will occur in the future (prognostic models), to inform their decision making. However, the overwhelming evidence shows that the quality of reporting of prediction model studies is poor. Only with full and clear reporting of information on all aspects of a prediction model can risk of bias and potential usefulness of prediction models be adequately assessed. The Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) Initiative developed a set of recommendations for the reporting of studies developing, validating, or updating a prediction model, whether for diagnostic or prognostic purposes. This article describes how the TRIPOD Statement was developed. An extensive list of items based on a review of the literature was created, which was reduced after a Web based survey and revised during a three day meeting in June 2011 with methodologists, health care professionals, and journal editors. The list was refined during several meetings of the steering group and in e-mail discussions with the wider group of TRIPOD contributors. The resulting TRIPOD Statement is a checklist of 22 items, deemed essential for transparent reporting of a prediction model study. The TRIPOD Statement aims to improve the transparency of the reporting of a prediction model study regardless of the study methods used. The TRIPOD Statement is best used in conjunction with the TRIPOD explanation and elaboration document. To aid the editorial process and readers of prediction model studies, it is recommended that authors include a completed checklist in their submission (also available at www.tripod-statement.org). To encourage dissemination of the TRIPOD Statement, this article is freely accessible on the Annals of Internal Medicine Web site (www.annals.org) and will be also published in BJOG, British Journal of Cancer, British Journal of Surgery, BMC Medicine, The BMJ, Circulation, Diabetic Medicine, European Journal of Clinical Investigation, European Urology, and Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. The authors jointly hold the copyright of this article. An accompanying explanation and elaboration article is freely available only on www.annals.org; Annals of Internal Medicine holds copyright for that article.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Collins et al. (2015) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d77ffdb1cb92dd1bb8b7f2https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7594
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Prognosis and prognostic research: validating a prognostic model2009 · 1,466 citations
  2. 2Ten steps towards improving prognosis research2009 · 161 citations
  3. 3Reporting and Methods in Clinical Prediction Research: A Systematic Review2012 · 614 citations
  4. 4Risk prediction models: I. Development, internal validation, and assessing the incremental value of a new (bio)marker2012 · 894 citations
  5. 5Strengthening the reporting of genetic risk prediction studies: the GRIPS statement2011 · 29 citations