PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 4, 2015Evidence-Based Nursing1,699 citationsOpen Access

Issues of validity and reliability in qualitative research

HNHelen NobleJSJoanna Smith

Key Points

  • Examine how traditional quantitative concepts of validity, reliability, and generalisability apply to qualitative research and outline strategies for establishing study credibility.
  • Comparative conceptual analysis of quantitative evaluation metrics (validity, reliability, generalisability) versus qualitative evaluation criteria.
  • Review of methodological strategies designed to minimize research bias and strengthen rigor in qualitative investigations.
  • Distinguishes core differences between quantitative metric evaluation and qualitative frameworks for assessing study trustworthiness.
  • Identifies specific procedural techniques qualitative investigators use to enhance research credibility and clinical applicability.

Abstract

Evaluating the quality of research is essential if findings are to be utilised in practice and incorporated into care delivery. In a previous article we explored 'bias' across research designs and outlined strategies to minimise bias. Concepts such as reliability, validity and generalisability typically associated with quantitative research and alternative terminology will be compared in relation to their application to qualitative research. In addition, some of the strategies adopted by qualitative researchers to enhance the credibility of their research are outlined.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Noble et al. (2015) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d7efcf319e71454dbedde0https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2015-102054
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper