PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 1959Biometrics619 citations

The Estimation of Environmental and Genetic Trends from Records Subject to Culling

View Full Paper
CHCharles HendersonOKOscar KempthorneSSS. R. Searle

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate how selection programs in breeding impact genetic and environmental trends over time.
  • Analyzed production records from a closed dairy herd using a two-way classification approach.
  • Applied least squares procedure to assess cow effects and their influence on year effects.
  • Identified biases in previous estimations of age correction and year effects.
  • Demonstrated deterioration in environment over years based on constant fitting, but adjustments corrected this bias.
  • Clarified that fixed cow effects led to previous underestimation of genetic improvement.
  • Suggested improved methods for estimating environmental and genetic contributions in breeding records.

Abstract

A very common problem which arises in animal or plant breeding research is that of assessinig the gain which has resulted from a selection program carr'ied oIn ovei a number of years. To be specific, let us suppose that we have a closed dairy herd which has been maintained over a number of years with selection being practiced. The records available for assessing any genetic improvemient consist of production records of cows in the various years and can be represented by a twoway classification, cow by year. At first it might be thought that such a two-way classification could be analyzed by the method of fitting constants Yates, 1934. Applications of this technique have, however, led to the apparent conclusion that the environment gradually deteriorated over the period of years, as indicated by the fact that the constants fitted for years tend to decrease year by year. Heinderson 1949 pointed out that a least squares procedure in which the cow effects are regarded as fixed leads to biased estimates. Lush and Shrode [19501 gave a simple explanation of the biases arising in the estimation of age correction factors; similar considerations apply to the estimation of year effects. The present paper is the combined

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Henderson et al. (1959) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d90e3ccc20f7a91c3afee5https://doi.org/10.2307/2527669
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper