PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 12, 2026New Forests0 citationsOpen Access

Integrating financial and climate scenario analyses into forest restoration: a framework with NTFP trees

LCLuz María CastroFRFabián Reyes-BuenoDEDiana Encalada

Key Points

  • The study aims to develop a framework for integrating financial and climate scenarios into non-timber forest product based forest restoration planning.
  • Utilized GIS-based Analytic Hierarchy Process for site selection.
  • Incorporated climate change scenario modelling and financial assessments.
  • Evaluated three different scenarios: current conditions, improved socioeconomic conditions, and climate change projections.
  • Biophysical factors predominantly influence site suitability, but socioeconomic constraints are crucial.
  • Suitable land increased from 6.5% to 15% under relaxed socioeconomic conditions.
  • Climate change projections reduced suitable areas and increased unsuitable land.
  • Financial analyses showed positive net returns across scenarios, even under pessimistic conditions.

Abstract

Productive forest restoration (PFR) offers a pathway to recover landscapes while generating income for local communities. Yet most restoration planning overlooks the potential of non-timber forest product (NTFP) species. We present an integrative modelling framework for NTFP-based PFR that combines a GIS-based Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for site selection, climate change scenario modelling, and financial assessments. The framework was applied to the Andean NTFP species Caesalpinia spinosa (Tara) in southern Ecuador, incorporating ecological, socioeconomic, and locational factors into the decision-making process. Three scenarios were evaluated: (i) current conditions, (ii) improved socioeconomic conditions, and (iii) climate change projections. Results show that while biophysical factors dominate site suitability, socioeconomic constraints—particularly household income and labour—are critical for viability. Under current conditions, 6.5% of the study area was marginally suitable, increasing to 15% when socioeconomic constraints were relaxed. Climate change reduced suitable land and expanded non-suitable areas, highlighting the importance of scenario-based planning. Finally, financial analyses revealed positive net returns across scenarios, even under pessimistic projections and discount rates up to 7%. By integrating ecological, socioeconomic, and financial dimensions, this framework advances modelling approaches for restoration planning and highlights the overlooked potential of NTFP species in climate-resilient restoration.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Castro et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69db37404fe01fead37c5366https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-026-10171-8
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A framework for climate-resilient forest planning and restoration: advances linking species distribution modelling, genetic adaptation and future climate scenarios2026 · 1 citations
  2. 2A Five-Step Framework for Creating Forests for the Future2024
  3. 3Optimizing restoration: A holistic spatial approach to deliver Nature’s Contributions to People with minimal tradeoffs and maximal equity2024 · 4 citations
  4. 4Non-Timber Forest Products and Community Well-Being: The Impact of a Landscape Restoration Programme in Maradi Region, Niger2025 · 6 citations
  5. 5Strategy and policy implementation for the transition to a green economy utilizing non-timber forest products in Papua province2025