Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
April 12, 2026Journal of Glaucoma

A Systematic Review of patient-reported Outcomes Instruments Relevant to Glaucoma

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

MKMichael Saheb KashafNNNiranjani NagarajanJLJimmy T. Lê

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

A systematic review evaluates the quality of patient-reported outcomes in glaucoma, highlighting key measures and their validation.

Key Points

  • This review aims to assess the quality of existing patient-reported outcome measures relevant to glaucoma and their validation status.
  • Conducted a systematic search across multiple databases for studies on vision-related PROMs in glaucoma patients.
  • Grouped eligible reports by instrument for quality assessment using COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist.
  • Evaluated the development, validation, and adaptation of identified PROMs.
  • Among 91 instruments assessed, only 13 met rigorous quality standards for development.
  • Seventeen out of ninety-one instruments showed adequate development based on COSMIN criteria.
  • Various constructs were evaluated, including vision-related quality of life and treatment preferences.

Cite This Study

Kashaf et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69db38274fe01fead37c65fbhttps://doi.org/10.1097/ijg.0000000000002640
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share