PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 17, 2026Sports0 citationsOpen Access

The Influence of Biological Age and Sex on Gross Motor Skill Development in Young Athletes: A Pilot Study

View Full Paper
MCMatthew S. ChapelskiTTTyler TaitSWStacey Woods

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate the influence of biological age and sex on the development of gross motor skills in young athletes.
  • Recruited 71 athletes aged 8 to 17 years (21 male, 50 female)
  • Measured height, sitting height, and body mass to predict biological age based on peak height velocity (PHV)
  • Classified athletes into pre-PHV, peri-PHV, and post-PHV categories
  • Used the Test of Gross Motor Development-2 to assess gross motor skills
  • Analyzed differences using ANCOVA while controlling for various factors
  • Post-PHV athletes showed significantly better gross motor skills (83.62 ± 6.09) compared to peri-PHV athletes (74.25 ± 12.92; p = 0.01)
  • No significant differences between pre-PHV and post-PHV groups (p = 0.13)
  • Males had greater GMS scores than females across all maturational categories (p < 0.05)

Abstract

Background: Gross movement skills (GMS) development is important for long-term physical activity participation. Despite this, the influence maturation has on GMS is understudied. The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the effect of maturation and sex on GMS in adolescents and identify numbers for a definitive study. Methods: We recruited seventy-one athletes (21 male, 50 female) from 8 to 17 years of age. Height, sitting height, and body mass were measured, and biological age (indexed as years from peak height velocity PHV) was predicted. Athletes were classified into three maturational categories: pre-PHV, peri-PHV, and post-PHV. The Test of Gross Motor Development-2 was used to assess GMS. Differences in overall GMS, locomotor skill, and object control skills were evaluated using ANCOVA controlling for height, weight, sex, physical activity, and sport specialization. Results: We found that GMS scores were greater for athletes post-PHV (83.62 ± 6.09) when compared to athletes peri-PHV (74.25 ± 12.92; p = 0.01). There were no differences between the pre-PHV and post-PHV groups (p = 0.13). Between sexes, males had greater GMS scores than females within each maturational category (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Our pilot study is inconclusive but suggests that factors such as sex, exposure to different GMS, and time spent practicing GMS may influence GMS performance to a greater extent than maturation. However, these findings are underpowered; a sample of 154 would be required for a definitive study.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chapelski et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e1ce3b5cdc762e9d8573eahttps://doi.org/10.3390/sports14040153
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper