PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 17, 2026Materials0 citationsOpen Access

Mechanical Performance of a Monolithic 3D-Printed Orthodontic Bracket–Crown System: An In-Vitro Study

View Full Paper
SMSelcen ESER MISIRSGSerkan GörgülüSASimel Ayyıldız

Key Points

  • Evaluate the mechanical performance of a new monolithic orthodontic bracket-crown system under load.
  • Sixty-six specimens divided into three groups: monolithic, porcelain crown, and natural teeth.
  • Used shear loading tests to assess resistance under load with a universal testing machine.
  • Each group included premolar and molar subgroups (n = 11 per group).
  • Monolithic group showed higher resistance (92.56 ± 63.88 MPa) compared to the other groups (p < 0.001).
  • No significant differences in resistance between porcelain crowns and natural teeth were found.
  • All values remained above clinically accepted thresholds, indicating potential clinical relevance.

Abstract

This study evaluated the resistance under load of a novel monolithic prosthetic design integrating functional orthodontic components within a digitally fabricated framework. Sixty-six specimens were allocated into three groups: (1) a Design Group consisting of one-piece 3D-printed customized metal copings with integrated brackets or tubes; (2) a Porcelain Crown Group with conventionally bonded orthodontic attachments; and (3) a Natural Teeth Group with brackets and tubes bonded to extracted human teeth. Each group included premolar (bracket) and molar (tube) subgroups (n = 11). All specimens were subjected to shear loading using a universal testing machine. Higher resistance values were observed in the monolithic group (92.56 ± 63.88 MPa) (p < 0.001); however, these values represent structural resistance rather than shear bond strength. Despite the wide variability, all measured values remained above the clinically accepted threshold. No statistically significant differences were observed between porcelain crowns and natural teeth in premolar or molar subgroups. The findings indicate that eliminating the adhesive interface enhances structural integrity under shear forces. This monolithic orthodontic–prosthetic approach may provide a clinically relevant alternative in cases where conventional bonding is not feasible and supports a fully digital, patient-specific workflow through scanner library integration.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

MISIR et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e1cfcb5cdc762e9d858bd8https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19081584
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper