PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 18, 2026Sacris Erudiri0 citations

New Evidence for a Late Dating of the De Trinitate Attributed to Didymus

View Full Paper
DZDimitrios Zaganas

Key Points

  • The aim is to present additional evidence supporting a later dating of De Trinitate ascribed to Didymus.
  • Analyzed internal evidence within De Trinitate.
  • Conducted source analysis comparing with similar theological texts.
  • Examined references to heretical views and their historical context.
  • Identified connections to Cyril of Alexandria's anti-Arian theology suggesting a later composition.
  • Found dependence on mid-fifth century sources for the views presented on heretics.
  • Noted stylistic choices indicating an intent to reinforce orthodoxy among readers.

Abstract

Abstract Of unknown authorship and unlikely attribution, the De Trinitate ascribed to Didymus the Blind ( CPG 2570) has generally been regarded as a work from the late fourth century ce . In the past decade, however, some scholars challenged this dating on the basis of internal evidence and source analysis. In the same vein, I recently argued that De Trinitate draws upon Cyril of Alexandria’s anti-Arian theology, and that its testimony to a developed cult of the archangels seems to point to the early sixth century. In this article, I adduce further evidence for a late dating. First, the author’s inclination to transfer expressions and concepts of anti-Arian Christology to Pneumatology, as well as the range of his sources of inspiration, suggest that he is posterior to Cyril of Alexandria, both chronologically and theologically. Second, his use of non-Christian sources as a proof of the doctrine of the Spirit reveals a certain dependence on Cyril of Alexandria’s Contra Julianum , while the quotation of a Christian “oracle” on the Spirit, probably dating from the mid-fifth century, provides a new, previously unnoticed terminus post quem . Third, at several points, his references to and knowledge of heretics such as Arians, Macedonians and Eunomians depend on mid-fifth century sources. Fourth, at a passage in Book 2 in which the author of De Trinitate speaks of himself, he appears to have adopted an intentionally polemical style, in order to express the doctrine of the Trinity in a more forceful way and “to induce more fervour of orthodoxy” to his readers.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dimitrios Zaganas (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e31ff140886becb653f024https://doi.org/10.1484/j.se.5.153411
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Researches on the borrowings of De Trinitate attributed to Didymus: A practice of cento?2025
  2. 2Prolegomena to a new edition of Didymus (?), De Trinitate: With a special focus on the first three folios of Biblioteca Angelica gr. 1162025
  3. 3The Development of Christological Beliefs: A Weighted Analysis of Extra-Biblical Evidence from the Apostolic Age to Chalcedon (1st–5th Centuries AD)2026
  4. 4The Development of Christological Beliefs: A Weighted Analysis of Extra-Biblical Evidence from the Apostolic Age to Chalcedon (1st–5th Centuries AD)2026
  5. 5The Development of Christological Beliefs: A Weighted Analysis of Extra-Biblical Evidence from the Apostolic Age to Chalcedon (1st–5th Centuries AD)2026