PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 30, 2026Journal of the American College of Cardiology648 citations

National Trends and Outcomes in Isolated Tricuspid Valve Surgery

View Full Paper
CZChad ZackEFErin A. FenderPCPranav Chandrashekar

Key Result

Tricuspid valve replacement was associated with significantly higher adjusted in-hospital mortality compared to tricuspid valve repair (OR 1.91; 95% CI 1.18 to 3.09; p=0.009).

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=5,005)

Multicenter

Yes

PICO

P
Population
Severe isolated disease of the tricuspid valve (n=5,005)
I
Intervention / Comparator
Tricuspid valve replacement vs Tricuspid valve repair
O
Primary Outcome
In-hospital mortality — OR 1.91 (1.18 to 3.09), p=0.009

Main Result

Effect estimate: OR 1.91 (95% CI 1.18 to 3.09)

p-value: p=0.009

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Severe isolated disease of the tricuspid valve (TV) is increasing and results in intractable right heart failure. However, isolated TV surgery is rarely performed, and there are little data describing surgical outcomes. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate contemporary utilization trends and in-hospital outcomes for isolated TV surgery in the United States. METHODS: Patients age >18 years who underwent TV repair or replacement from 2004 to 2013 were identified using the National Inpatient Sample. Patients with congenital heart disease, with endocarditis, and undergoing concomitant cardiac operations except for coronary bypass surgery were excluded. RESULTS: Over a 10-year period, a total of 5,005 isolated TV operations were performed nationally. Operations per year increased from 290 in 2004 to 780 in 2013 (p < 0.001 for trend). In-hospital mortality was 8.8% and did not vary across the study period. Adjusted in-hospital mortality for TV replacement was significantly higher than TV repair (odds ratio: 1.91; 95% confidence interval: 1.18 to 3.09; p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Isolated TV surgery is rarely performed, although utilization has increased over time. However, despite an increase in surgical volume, operative mortality has not changed. Mortality is greatest in patients undergoing valve replacement. Given the increasing prevalence of isolated TV disease in the population, research into optimal surgical timing and patient selection is critical.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zack et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Severe isolated disease of the tricuspid valve (n=5,005). Tricuspid valve replacement vs. Tricuspid valve repair was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.18 to 3.09, p=0.009). Tricuspid valve replacement was associated with significantly higher adjusted in-hospital mortality compared to tricuspid valve repair (OR 1.91; 95% CI 1.18 to 3.09; p=0.009).

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f31e7eb24eb58ef2fb05a1https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.039
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper