PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2026Open Forum Infectious Diseases1 citationsOpen Access

16S rRNA bacterial identification in evaluation of orthopedic infections and its limited role in antimicrobial stewardship

View Full Paper
JMJoseph A. McBrideMMMemee MouaASAlana Sterkel

Key Points

  • To evaluate the diagnostic value of 16S bacterial identification for orthopedic infections and its impact on antibiotic de-escalation.
  • Retrospective cohort study involving patient encounters with 16S for orthopedic infections over a 5-year period.
  • Included qualitative analysis of clinical cases, antibiotic use, and 16S results.
  • 452 episodes were analyzed, with 9.5% detecting bacteria by 16S.
  • The sensitivity of 16S was 15.5% and specificity was 98%.
  • Antibiotic de-escalation was observed post-16S, but many negative results still led to continued antibiotic use.

Abstract

Abstract Background 16S bacterial identification is a molecular diagnostic test that can aid in the diagnosis and management of orthopedic infections. The study aims to describe the diagnostic value of 16S for orthopedic infections and whether results of 16S impact antibiotic de-escalation. Methods This retrospective cohort study included all patient encounters with 16S performed for evaluation of orthopedic infections at one Midwest academic center over a 5-year pre-pandemic period. Qualitative descriptions of the clinical cases, antibiotics, and 16S results were evaluated. Results 452 episodes were included for analysis. Overall, 9.5% of 16S test detected bacteria. The most common indication for testing was for evaluation of septic arthritis. For diagnosing infectious episodes, 16S had a sensitivity of 15.5%, a specificity of 98%, positive predictive value of 90.7%, and a negative predictive value of 47.9%. Analysis of all episodes demonstrated antibiotic de-escalation from pre-16S to post-16S time points. However, antibiotics were continued for a large number of episodes with negative 16S when judged as infectious by the treating clinician. Conclusions 16S bacterial identification aided in the diagnosis and treatment of only a minority of orthopedic infections and results did not serve as a useful tool for antimicrobial de-escalation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

McBride et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fa98bd04f884e66b5326cdhttps://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofag262
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Targeted Versus Shotgun Metagenomic Sequencing-based Detection of Microorganisms in Sonicate Fluid for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Diagnosis2022 · 80 citations
  2. 2The first case of Planococcus glaciei found in blood, a report from the Czech Republic2021 · 8 citations
  3. 3Rapid PCR-Based Diagnosis of Septic Arthritis by Early Gram-Type Classification and Pathogen Identification2008 · 92 citations
  4. 4First described case of prosthetic joint infection with Clostridium disporicum2017 · 9 citations
  5. 5Administration of antibiotic agents before intraoperative sampling in orthopedic infections alters culture results2015 · 86 citations