PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 7, 2026ACS ES&T Engineering1 citationsOpen Access

Electrochemical Nutrient Recovery for the Food–Energy–Water Nexus at Municipal Wastewater Facilities: Multivariate Analyses of Seasonal Sampling and Reactor Performance

View Full Paper
SHSana HeydarianNortheastern UniversityLALawrence O. AjayiUniversidad del NoresteSASyed Asad AbbasAustralian Regenerative Medicine Institute

Key Points

  • To investigate the effectiveness of electrochemical nutrient recovery in reducing nutrient loads from wastewater facilities.
  • Conducted a 1-year sampling of recycle streams from municipal wastewater facilities.
  • Implemented electrochemical nutrient recovery processes.
  • Performed multivariate screening analyses to identify significant factors affecting nutrient recovery.
  • Achieved 95% phosphorus recovery using optimal conditions of cathodic potential and temperature.
  • Demonstrated energy consumption of 0.03 kWh/kg P, significantly lower than conventional processes.
  • Identified key variables such as anode type and NH4+ concentration affecting nutrient recovery.

Abstract

Digester-equipped municipal wastewater facilities generate recycle streams with high nutrient loads that increase energy consumption and can cause environmental pollution. The reduction of these loads through electrochemical nutrient recovery (ENR) could enhance the food–energy–water nexus by producing fertilizer (struvite). This study investigated the recovery process through a 1 year sampling of recycle streams and the implementation of nutrient recovery. Time series analyses showed that P (as orthophosphate) concentration was time-variant in digester effluent streams, while N (as ammonia) concentration was time-variant in only the aerobic system. Furthermore, these two nutrient concentrations did not correlate in any of the recycle streams. Subsequent multivariate screening analyses identified anode type, NH4+ concentration, cathodic potential, P concentration, and temperature as most significant for ENR. Finally, the optimum conditions of cathodic potential, anode area-to-volume ratio, and temperature applied to a real recycle stream resulted in 95% P recovery with 0.03 kWh/kg P. This energy consumption is significantly lower than process energy for conventional P fertilizers (1.1 kWh/kg P) and chemical recovery processes at scale (1.7–12.9 kWh/kg P). Overall, this study recommended specific process controls for nutrient recovery, expanded the variables evaluated for ENR, and demonstrated the ability to significantly impact energy demand associated with P-based fertilizers.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Heydarian et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fbf004164b5133a91a44cdhttps://doi.org/10.1021/acsestengg.6c00096
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper