PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 7, 2026Current Clinical Microbiology Reports0 citationsOpen Access

Foodborne Parasites: Current Insights and Perspectives

MKMeera Probha KabirazPMPriyanka Rani MajumdarSBShuva Bhowmik

Key Points

  • To synthesize current knowledge regarding foodborne parasites, highlighting their burden and detection challenges.
  • Review of global burden and distribution of foodborne parasites
  • Analysis of conventional and modern diagnostic techniques
  • Evaluation of control measures and their implementation across populations.
  • Foodborne parasites are a significant yet underestimated cause of illness globally.
  • Conventional diagnostics lack sensitivity for mixed infections, while modern methods show high accuracy but often overestimate infection risk.
  • Uniform implementation of effective control measures is lacking, impacting food safety.

Abstract

Abstract Purpose of Review This review synthesises current knowledge on the global burden, distribution, pathogenicity, surveillance, detection and control of foodborne parasites (FBPs), identifies key challenges in monitoring and intervention and highlights emerging strategies to reduce disease impact and improve food safety worldwide. Recent Findings FBPs represent a major but frequently overlooked contributor to global foodborne illnesses, impacting millions of individuals and imposing considerable health and economic burdens. These parasites are primarily transmitted through contaminated food, and their prevalence is strongly influenced by environmental conditions, sanitation infrastructure, and food-handling practices. Effective surveillance is essential for estimating disease burden, identifying high-risk populations and guiding targeted interventions. However, the true burden remains underestimated due to underreporting, fragmented surveillance, and limited diagnostic capacity. Conventional diagnostic methods, such as microscopy and immunoassays, are widely used but lack sensitivity and specificity, particularly for subclinical or mixed infections, whereas molecular, biosensor and AI-based techniques, despite high accuracy, are often inaccessible in resource-limited settings. Control measures, including proper food preparation, access to safe food and targeted treatment of infections, demonstrate effectiveness but are not uniformly implemented across populations. Summary Modern molecular and digital diagnostics improve the speed and sensitivity of detecting foodborne parasites. However, they often detect genetic material without confirming viable or infective stages, which may overestimate actual infection risk. Therefore, combining these tools with viability-based or complementary methods is essential for accurate surveillance and public health response.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kabiraz et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fc2c1f8b49bacb8b347cdchttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40588-026-00268-1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Circulating cell-free DNA as a biomarker for diagnosis of Schistosomiasis japonica2024 · 5 citations
  2. 2Development and synthesis of DNA-based label-free electrochemical biosensor for detection of Enterocytozoon bieneusi using screen-printed gold electrode2025 · 7 citations
  3. 3Amoebiasis in a Non-endemic Country: Epidemiology, Presenting Symptoms and Diagnostic Methods1983 · 18 citations
  4. 4Human infection by Trichostrongylus sp in Tunisia: case report2025 · 3 citations
  5. 5Biological control: a novel strategy for the control of the plant parasitic nematodes2021 · 120 citations