PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 8, 2026HemaSphere0 citationsOpen Access

Outcomes and salvage strategies for large B‐cell lymphoma progressing after second‐line CAR T‐cell therapy: A DESCAR‐T study from the LYSA group

View Full Paper
PSPierre SesquesGMGuillaume MansonGCGuillaume Cartron

Key Points

  • This study aims to describe outcomes and salvage management strategies for large B‐cell lymphoma patients relapsing after second-line CAR T‐cell therapy.
  • Multicenter retrospective study utilizing the French DESCAR‐T registry
  • Analyzed 297 patients with large B‐cell lymphoma relapsing after 2L CAR T‐cell therapy
  • Evaluated treatment types, response rates, and prognostic factors.
  • Overall response rate after relapse was 39.1%, with a complete response rate of 27.6%
  • Median overall survival after relapse was 6.5 months
  • Multivariate analysis identified early relapse, ECOG score ≥ 2, and elevated C-reactive protein as poor prognostic indicators.

Abstract

Abstract Relapse after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T‐cell therapy in large B‐cell lymphoma (LBCL) is associated with a dismal prognosis. Although Phase 3 trials have established CAR T‐cells as standard second‐line (2L) therapy, outcomes and optimal management after relapse in this setting remain unknown because no real‐world data are currently available. We conducted a multicenter retrospective study using the French DESCAR‐T registry, including patients with LBCL who relapsed after 2L CAR T‐cell therapy with axicabtagene ciloleucel or lisocabtagene maraleucel. The objective was to describe postrelapse treatments, outcomes, and prognostic factors. Among the 893 patients treated with 2L CAR T‐cells, 297 (33%) relapsed and were analyzed. Median time to relapse was 2.7 months, with 35% of these relapses occurring within 2 months. Among the 231 treated patients, bispecific antibody (BsAb)‐based regimens were the most common type of salvage therapy (65%). The overall response rate after relapse was 39.1%, with a complete response rate of 27.6%. Notably, despite the use of BsAb‐based therapy in 65% of patients, the median overall survival (OS2) after relapse was only 6.5 months (median progression‐free survival PFS2: 3.4 months). Patients treated with BsAb monotherapy achieved a median OS of 7.1 months. Multivariate analysis revealed that early relapse (<6 months), an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) ≥ 2, and an elevated C‐reactive protein (≥30 mg/L) were independently associated with poor OS. This study represents the first real‐world analysis of outcomes after relapse following 2L CAR T‐cell therapy. Despite the more frequent incorporation of BsAbs into the therapeutic landscape, overall prognosis and treatment efficacy remain dismal, highlighting the urgent need for innovative therapeutic strategies and dedicated prospective trials in this emerging double‐refractory population.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sesques et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7fb8bfa21ec5bbf083e0https://doi.org/10.1002/hem3.70356
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Outcome of patients with large B-cell lymphoma relapsing after second-line CAR-t: Insights from the descar-t registry2025
  2. 2Clinical and pathological features of patients with large B-cell lymphoma relapsing after CAR T-cell therapy2025 · 1 citations
  3. 3Several factors that predict the outcome of large B‐cell lymphoma patients who relapse/progress after chimeric antigen receptor (<scp>CAR</scp>) T‐cell therapy can be identified before cell administration2024 · 2 citations
  4. 4First-line salvage therapies in relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma after second- or third-line CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy2025
  5. 5Treatment outcomes in patients with large B‐cell lymphoma after progression to chimeric antigen receptor T‐cell therapy2024 · 18 citations