PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 10, 2026SLEEP0 citations

0096 Longitudinal Rest-Activity Rhythms Are Associated with Cognitive Trajectories and Clinical Outcomes in Older Adults

View Full Paper
DCDaniel CallowASAdam SpiraAMAbhay Moghekar

Key Points

  • The study aims to determine how mean and changing rest-activity rhythms relate to cognitive function and mild cognitive impairment in older adults.
  • Analyzed data from 169 cognitively unimpaired adults over 2-8 years with wrist actigraphy.
  • Measured rest-activity rhythm parameters including relative amplitude, interdaily stability, and intradaily variability.
  • Used linear mixed-effects models to assess associations with executive function and Cox models for incident mild cognitive impairment.
  • Higher mean relative amplitude and greater interdaily stability were linked to better executive function (RA B= 0.102, p < 0.001; IS B = 0.079, p = 0.014).
  • Time-varying reductions in relative amplitude were associated with decreased executive function (RA B = 0.023, p = 0.004).
  • Higher mean relative amplitude correlated with lower risk of developing mild cognitive impairment (HR = 0.499, p = 0.004).

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Altered circadian rhythms have been implicated in cognitive health, and 24-hour actigraphic rest-activity rhythms (RARs) are commonly used as estimates of circadian rhythmicity. Prior work has mostly examined only baseline RARs, so it remains uncertain whether mean RAR parameters or their changes over time are associated with cognitive trajectories or incident mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Methods We studied 169 cognitively unimpaired adults (71.1 8.7 years) in the BIOCARD study with wrist-actigraphy data; 137 completed 2–4 follow-up visits over 2–8 years. RAR metrics included relative amplitude (RA; day–night activity contrast), interdaily stability (IS; day-to-day regularity), and intradaily variability (IV; within-day fragmentation). Each metric was decomposed into between-person mean levels (reflecting participants’ average RAR across visits) and time-varying changes (capturing visit-to-visit deviations from each participant’s mean). Linear mixed-effects models examined associations of both mean levels and time-varying changes with longitudinal executive function, adjusting for age, sex, education, APOE-ε4 status, vascular risk, valid actigraphy days, and time since baseline, with random intercepts for participants. Exploratory Cox proportional hazards models assessed associations with time to incident MCI (n=12), incorporating both mean parameters and time-varying changes. Results Participants with higher mean RA, greater IS, and lower IV across follow-up had better executive function (RA B= 0.102, p 0.001; IS B = 0.079, p = 0.014; IV B = −0.067, p = 0.035). Time-varying reductions in RA and increases in IV were associated with concurrent decrements in executive function (RA B = 0.023, p = 0.004; IV B = −0.019, p = 0.026). In the exploratory Cox model, higher mean RA was associated with lower MCI risk (HR = 0.499, p = 0.004), whereas time-varying changes in RA, IS, or IV were not significantly associated with MCI. Conclusion Both mean and time-varying changes in RAR parameters were associated with executive function, with stronger, more regular, and less fragmented rhythms linked to better performance. Higher mean RA was also associated with lower MCI risk. These findings highlight RARs as markers of or contributors to cognitive health and suggest that longitudinal monitoring can provide insight into cognitive resilience in older adults. Support (if any)

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Callow et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0021cdc8f74e3340f9cc4dhttps://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsag091.0096
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper