PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 16, 2026Cureus0 citationsOpen Access

Single-Institution Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Gemcitabine and Nab-Paclitaxel Combination in Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Three-Year Retrospective Audit

GRGoutham Reddy RamidiRYRajan YadavAPAbinash Patnaik

Key Points

  • Assess the effectiveness and safety of neoadjuvant gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in treating borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
  • Retrospective audit of 34 patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer treated with neoadjuvant gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel.
  • Patients received three to six cycles of treatment according to institutional standards.
  • Outcomes analyzed included surgical, pathological, toxicity, progression-free survival, and overall survival.
  • Partial response observed in 14 patients (41%), stable disease in 13 patients (38%), and progressive disease in 7 patients (21%).
  • Curative-intent resection achieved in 19 patients (56%) of the overall cohort, with R0 resection in 13 (68%) of resected patients.
  • Median progression-free survival was 14.2 months and median overall survival was 22.8 months, with a three-year overall survival of 28%.

Abstract

Background Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly aggressive and difficult-to-treat cancer, with five-year survival rates still low despite advances in treatment. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) is associated with a high risk of margin-positive resection and early systemic relapse when treated with upfront surgery alone. Neoadjuvant systemic therapy is therefore recommended to improve resectability and oncologic outcomes. Although combination chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) is effective, its toxicity limits use in routine clinical practice. Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) represents a commonly used alternative with a more favourable tolerability profile. Methods This retrospective audit included consecutive adult patients with histologically confirmed BRPC treated with neoadjuvant GnP at a single tertiary care center between January 2022 and December 2024. Borderline resectability was defined using National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria, with institutional interpretation informed by international consensus recommendations. Patients received three to six cycles of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel according to institutional standards. Radiologic response was assessed using the standard guideline Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, with qualitative evaluation of the tumor-vessel interface guiding surgical decision-making. Surgical, pathological, toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) outcomes were analyzed. Results Thirty-four patients were included, with a median age of 61 years; 27 patients (79%) had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 1, and seven patients (21%) had ECOG performance status 2. Partial response (PR) was observed in 14 patients (41%), stable disease (SD) in 13 patients (38%), and progressive disease (PD) in 7 patients (21%). Improvement in the tumor-vessel interface was documented in 16 patients (47%). Surgical exploration was undertaken in 22 patients (65%), and curative-intent resection was achieved in 19 patients (56%) of the overall cohort. R0 resection was achieved in 13 (68%) of resected patients. Median PFS was 14.2 months, and median OS was 22.8 months, with a three-year OS of 28%. These outcomes were consistent with previously reported neoadjuvant GnP studies and the Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Cetuximab and nab-Paclitaxel Trial (LAPACT) trial experience. Conclusions Neoadjuvant gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel combination is a feasible and effective treatment option for borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma in real-world practice. While outcomes may be inferior to those reported with FOLFIRINOX in highly selected patients, GnP provides meaningful disease control with acceptable toxicity and remains a pragmatic option when intensive regimens are unsuitable.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ramidi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a080b84a487c87a6a40d970https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.108823
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ( <scp>FOLFIRINOX</scp> or Gemcitabine With Nab‐Paclitaxel) for Borderline‐Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Long‐Term Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial ( <scp>NUPAT</scp> ‐01)2026
  2. 2Neoadjuvant Early Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Followed by Chemoimmunotherapy in Borderline Resectable and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer2026
  3. 3Preoperative Gemcitabine/Nab‐Paclitaxel With Concurrent Radiation Therapy for Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Comparative Analysis With Preoperative Chemoradiation Therapy Using Gemcitabine Alone2026
  4. 4Perioperative Therapy for Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: An Academic Gastrointestinal Cancer Consortium (AGICC) Study2025
  5. 5Updated results of a single-arm phase II clinical trial of gemcitabine, cisplatin, and nab-paclitaxel as neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.2026