PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 23, 1992New England Journal of Medicine481 citationsOpen Access

Geographic Variation in the Treatment of Localized Breast Cancer

View Full Paper
DFDiana C. FarrowWHWilliam C. HuntJSJonathan M. Samet

Key Points

  • To assess the geographic variation in the use of breast-conserving surgery for localized breast cancer in the U.S.
  • Analyzed data from 18,399 non-Hispanic white, 324 Hispanic, and 1174 black women with breast cancer.
  • Examined trends from 1983 to 1986 across nine U.S. areas using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results Program.
  • Breast-conserving surgery rates among white women ranged from 9.2% in Iowa to 32.1% in Seattle in 1983-1984.
  • The proportion of women receiving radiation therapy post-surgery varied by geography, with increases noted from 1983 to 1986.
  • Older women and black women in certain areas were less likely to receive radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breast-conserving surgery followed by radiation therapy is as effective as modified radical mastectomy in treating women with localized breast cancer, as demonstrated by clinical trials reported during the 1980s. The extent to which breast-conserving surgery has been adopted in various regions of the United States is not known. METHODS: We assessed variations in the use of breast-conserving surgery from 1983 to 1986 in 18,399 non-Hispanic white, 324 Hispanic, and 1174 black women with breast cancer in nine areas of the United States, using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results Program of the National Cancer Institute. RESULTS: The proportion of white women with localized breast cancer who underwent breast-conserving surgery ranged from 9.2 percent (Iowa) to 32.1 percent (Seattle) in 1983-1984 and from 19.6 percent (Iowa) to 41.5 percent (Seattle) in 1985-1986. Between 1983 and 1986, the use of breast-conserving surgery increased in each area, but the relative rankings of the areas changed little. The frequency of the use of breast-conserving surgery in black and Hispanic women was comparable to that in white women. The proportion of women who received radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery also varied geographically and increased from 1983 to 1986 in all areas. Older women in all areas and black women in Atlanta and Detroit were less likely than other women to receive radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery. CONCLUSIONS: There is marked variation in the United States in the use of breast-conserving surgery for localized breast cancer. The variation is not explained by demographic factors, although race and age affect the use of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Farrow et al. (1992) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0cef0d4e02b7512ccc8c31https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199204233261701
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Comparing Radical Mastectomy with Quadrantectomy, Axillary Dissection, and Radiotherapy in Patients with Small Cancers of the Breast1981 · 1,618 citations
  2. 2Relationship Between Age at Diagnosis and Treatments1985 · 173 citations
  3. 3Geographic Variation in the Use of Breast-Conserving Treatment for Breast Cancer1992 · 553 citations
  4. 4Variations in the Use of Medical and Surgical Services by the Medicare Population1986 · 659 citations
  5. 5Outcomes Management1988 · 591 citations