PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 21, 2026Energies2 citationsOpen Access

Dynamic Carbon-Aware Scheduling for Electric Vehicle Fleets Using VMD-BSLO-CTL Forecasting and Multi-Objective MPC

View Full Paper
HWHongyu WangZZZhiyu ZhaoKCKai Cui

Key Points

  • The study aims to enhance low-carbon demand-side response through effective EV fleet charging strategies.
  • Developed a hybrid forecasting model using VMD and CNN-Transformer-LSTM with BSLO for optimization.
  • Validated the model using UK National Grid data to assess its robustness over varying prediction horizons.
  • Implemented a multi-objective Model Predictive Control (MPC) for real-world EV charging considerations.
  • Achieved a 4.17% reduction in economic costs for EV charging.
  • Reduced carbon emissions by 8.82% through optimized scheduling.
  • Lowered peak-valley difference by 6.46% and load variance by 11.34%.

Abstract

Accurate perception of dynamic carbon intensity is a prerequisite for low-carbon demand-side response. However, traditional grid-average carbon factors lack the spatio-temporal granularity required for real-time regulation. To address this, this paper proposes a “Prediction-Optimization” closed-loop framework for electric vehicle (EV) fleets. First, a hybrid forecasting model (VMD-BSLO-CTL) is constructed. By integrating Variational Mode Decomposition (VMD) with a CNN-Transformer-LSTM network optimized by the Blood-Sucking Leech Optimizer (BSLO), the model effectively captures multi-scale features. Validation on the UK National Grid dataset demonstrates its superior robustness against prediction horizon extension compared to state-of-the-art baselines. Second, a multi-objective Model Predictive Control (MPC) strategy is developed to guide EV charging. Applied to a real-world station-level scenario, the strategy navigates the trade-offs between user economy and grid stability. Simulation results show that the proposed framework simultaneously reduces economic costs by 4.17% and carbon emissions by 8.82%, while lowering the peak-valley difference by 6.46% and load variance by 11.34%. Finally, a cloud-edge collaborative deployment scheme indicates the engineering potential of the proposed approach for next-generation low-carbon energy management.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69706c87b6488063ad5c1917https://doi.org/10.3390/en19020456
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Optimization of Electric Vehicle Charging Control in a Demand-Side Management Context: A Model Predictive Control Approach2024 · 11 citations
  2. 2Stochastic Scenario-Based Multi-Objective MILP Optimization of Large-Scale EV Fleets in V2G-Enabled Smart Grids Considering Battery Degradation and Lifecycle Emissions2026
  3. 3Carbon-Aware Rolling-Horizon Energy Management of Electric Vehicles via Virtual Power Plants Under Carbon–Grid Conflict2026 · 1 citations
  4. 4Linear programming MPC optimal V2G scheduling of electric vehicles considering battery degradation2026
  5. 5Grid-aware Scheduling and Control of Electric Vehicle Charging Stations for Dispatching Active Distribution Networks. Part-II: Intra-day and Experimental Validation2024