PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 21, 2026Encyclopedia0 citationsOpen Access

Digital Governance as an Enabler of Economic Recovery and Developmental Transformation: Insights from Greece’s 2010–2018 Financial Adjustment Programmes

View Full Paper
ETEleni TsiaousiDDDimitrios DimitriouDCDionysios P. Chionis

Key Points

  • The study aims to explore the interplay between digital governance and economic recovery during Greece's financial adjustment programmes.
  • Review of programme evaluations and academic literature
  • Analysis of empirical indicators
  • Examination of institutional frictions and timing of reforms
  • Observations of recovery momentum when digital public services began reducing transaction costs
  • Identification of persistent output losses linked to ineffective sequencing of reforms
  • Insights into the role of digital governance as a complement to structural reforms

Abstract

Greece’s 2010–2018 adjustment programmes provide an insightful case of how timing of reforms, institutional frictions, and digital transformation jointly condition the outcomes of macroeconomic stabilization efforts. This review builds on programme evaluations, recent academic work, and empirical indicators to analyze the dynamics at the intersection of macroeconomic adjustment, institutional quality, and entrepreneurship, placing emphasis on productivity and the evolving role of digital governance. The paper argues that the asymmetric sequencing of fiscal consolidation, internal devaluation, institution-building, and digital modernization is consistent with deeper and more persistent output losses than initially anticipated, as complementary reforms in product markets and public administration were not yet in place. Recovery momentum was observed when administrative simplification, transparency reforms, and digital public services began to reduce transaction costs, uncertainty, and implementation frictions. In this perspective, digital governance—through initiatives such as Diavgeia, and interoperable registries—acted as an enabling complement to the effectiveness of structural reforms, supporting the shift towards a more innovation-oriented entrepreneurial ecosystem. While the evidence is associative rather than causally identified, the synthesis highlights mechanisms and transferable lessons for the design and sequencing of reform programmes in crisis and recovery contexts.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tsiaousi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69706c87b6488063ad5c1942https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia6010022
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Greece2013 · 133 citations
  2. 2Walk the line: Conflict, state capacity and the political dynamics of reform2014 · 13 citations
  3. 3Economy, Finance and Business in Southeastern and Central Europe2018 · 9 citations
  4. 4GovTech Maturity Index2021 · 69 citations
  5. 5Is the Greek Crisis One of Supply or Demand?2015 · 59 citations