PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 6, 2026European Heart Journal0 citations

Real-world impact of intermittent levosimendan on survival, hospitalizations, and healthcare costs in advanced heart failure

View Full Paper
JPJ Fernandes PedroDFD Rosa FerreiraMVM Vilela

Key Result

Intermittent levosimendan significantly improved survival probability compared to baseline predicted life expectancy (HR 0.409; 95% CI 0.224-0.747; p=0.004) in advanced heart failure patients.

Key Points

  • To assess the effects of intermittent levosimendan on survival, hospitalizations, and healthcare costs in patients with advanced heart failure.
  • Single-center, prospective, one-arm study design.
  • Included advanced heart failure patients receiving intermittent levosimendan.
  • Compared hospitalizations and emergency room visits before and after treatment.
  • Conducted survival analysis using predicted life expectancy from the Seattle Heart Failure Model.
  • Performed cost analysis based on standardized rates for treatments and admissions.
  • Survival probability significantly improved, with 35.3% exceeding baseline predicted life expectancy.
  • Median number of hospitalizations decreased from 4 to 2 per patient after treatment.
  • Emergency room visits dropped from 5 to 2 per patient.
  • Mean healthcare costs per patient decreased from €17,298 to €10,682.50.
  • Average savings per patient was €4,112.76 due to fewer hospitalizations.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=34)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Does intermittent levosimendan improve survival, reduce hospitalizations, and lower healthcare costs in patients with advanced heart failure?

P
Population
34 consecutive advanced heart failure patients (79.4% male; median age 68 years; baseline LV ejection fraction 24%; 82.4% in NYHA class III) treated in a tertiary hospital.
I
Intervention
Intermittent levosimendan (iLev) administered as inpatient 24-hour and outpatient 6-hour infusions.
C
Comparator
Intra-patient historical control (the same period before treatment) for hospitalizations and costs, and baseline predicted life expectancy (PLE) using the Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM) for survival.
O
Outcome
Survival, number of HF-related admissions, emergency room (ER) visits, and overall healthcare costs.hard clinical

Intermittent levosimendan in advanced heart failure is associated with improved survival compared to predicted life expectancy, fewer hospitalizations, and reduced healthcare costs.

Main Result

Effect estimate: HR 0.409 (95% CI 0.224-0.747)

p-value: p=0.004

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Advanced heart failure (HF) is a major healthcare challenge leading to high morbidity, frequent hospitalizations, and significant economic burden. Intermittent levosimendan (iLev) has been associated with a reduction in HF admissions, however its impact on survival outcomes and economic burden is still not well established in a real-world setting. Purpose To assess the prognostic impact of iLev in advanced HF patients by evaluating its effects on survival, hospitalizations, emergency room (ER) visits, and overall healthcare costs. Methods This single-center, prospective, one-arm study included consecutive advanced HF patients receiving iLev in a tertiary hospital. The number of HF-related admissions and ER visits after iLev was compared to the same period before treatment. Survival analysis was performed comparing baseline predicted life expectancy (PLE) using the Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM) with observed survival. For patients who neither surpassed their PLE nor died at follow-up, a recalculated PLE was used to estimate survival benefit. Cost analysis was based on standardized Ministry of Health rates for hospitalizations, ER visits, and outpatient iLev administrations. Statistical analysis included the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and Cox regression. Results A total of 34 advanced HF patients (79.4% male; median age 68 years and baseline LV ejection fraction 24%; 82,4% in NYHA class III) were included, with a median follow-up of 1.3 years (IQR 0.7–2.7). Survival analysis showed that 35.3% exceeded their baseline PLE, 32.4% died before reaching it, and 32.3% remained alive but had not reached it at follow-up. The median baseline PLE was 30.5 months (IQR 21–44), while observed survival or recalculated PLE was 39.5 months (IQR 11–54.25). Survival probability significantly improved compared to baseline PLE (HR 0.409; 95% CI 0.224–0.747; p=0.004 – Figure 1). The median number of HF admissions per patient decreased from 4 (IQR 2–5) to 2 (IQR 1–3) (p0.001), while ER visits dropped from 5 (IQR 3–14) to 2 (IQR 1–5) (p0.001). A total of 283 iLev infusions were administered (142 inpatient 24-hour and 141 outpatient 6-hour). Mean cost per patient before iLev was €17,298.00 (IQR €8,957–23,696), decreasing to €10,682.50 (IQR €6,268–18,540) post-treatment initiation (p=0.010). The average savings per patient was €4,112.76, primarily due to fewer hospitalizations. Conclusion Intermittent levosimendan was associated with improved survival, fewer hospitalizations and ER visits, and significant cost savings in advanced HF patients. These findings support its role as an effective adjunctive therapy even in a real-world setting.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pedro et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Advanced heart failure (n=34). Intermittent levosimendan vs. Baseline predicted life expectancy and pre-treatment period was evaluated on Survival probability compared to baseline predicted life expectancy (HR 0.409, 95% CI 0.224-0.747, p=0.004). Intermittent levosimendan significantly improved survival probability compared to baseline predicted life expectancy (HR 0.409; 95% CI 0.224-0.747; p=0.004) in advanced heart failure patients.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698586238f7c464f2300a0b6https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf784.1108
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper