PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 6, 2026European Heart Journal0 citations

Association of systolic blood pressure time in target range with heart failure risk and mediating roles of NT-proBNP, hs-cTnI, and eGFR: novel findings from the SPRINT trial

View Full Paper
WCW H ChenSSS S ShiZLZ J Li

Key Result

Higher systolic blood pressure time in target range (66-100%) was associated with a lower risk of heart failure compared to <66% time in target range (adjusted HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.56-0.98; P=0.034).

Key Points

  • The study aims to investigate the relationship between systolic blood pressure time in target range and heart failure risk, along with the mediating roles of specific biomarkers.
  • Post-hoc analysis of SPRINT trial data involving 7962 participants
  • Evaluation of systolic blood pressure time in target range using the Rosendaal method
  • Analysis of biomarker changes (NT-proBNP, hs-cTnI, eGFR) over one year
  • Cox proportional hazards models to assess relationships among variables
  • Higher systolic blood pressure time in target range (66%-100%) linked to lower heart failure risk (adjusted HR: 0.74)
  • Lower risk of composite outcome of heart failure and all-cause mortality (adjusted HR: 0.77)
  • NT-proBNP and eGFR indicated favorable changes, but not hs-cTnI
  • NT-proBNP and eGFR mediated a small percentage of the effect on heart failure risk

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=7,962)

Structured PICO

Does higher systolic blood pressure time in target range reduce heart failure risk in patients with intensive or standard blood pressure targets?

P
Population
7,962 participants from the SPRINT trial with intensive (<120 mmHg) or standard (<140 mmHg) systolic blood pressure targets
I
Intervention
Higher systolic blood pressure time in target range (TTR) (66% to 100%)
C
Comparator
Lower systolic blood pressure time in target range (TTR) (<66%)
O
Outcome
Heart failure riskhard clinical

Higher systolic blood pressure time in target range is independently associated with reduced heart failure risk, an effect partially mediated by favorable changes in NT-proBNP and eGFR.

Main Result

Effect estimate: adjusted HR 0.74 (95% CI 0.56-0.98)

p-value: p=0.034

Abstract

Abstract Aims Although achieving lower systolic blood pressure (SBP) targets reduces HF risk, the role and mechanisms of SBP time in target range (TTR) in heart failure (HF) risk and related biomarkers remain unclear. This study investigates the relationship between SBP TTR and HF risk, along with changes in biomarkers over one year and their potential mediating roles. Methods This post-hoc analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) examined the association between SBP TTR and HF risk among 7962 participants with intensive (120 mmHg) or standard (140 mmHg) SBP targets. SBP TTR was calculated using the Rosendaal method. Biomarker changes in high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) over one year were analyzed as potential mediators. Cox proportional hazards models and mediation analyses assessed relationships between SBP TTR, biomarkers, and HF outcomes. Results Participants with higher SBP TTR (66% to 100%) exhibited significantly lower risks of HF (adjusted HR: 0.74; 95% confidence interval CI: 0.56–0.98; P=0.034) and the composite outcome of HF and all-cause mortality (adjusted HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.64–0.92; P=0.004) compared to lower SBP TTR (66%). High SBP TTR was associated with favorable changes in NT-proBNP and eGFR, but not hs-cTnI. Mediation analyses revealed that NT-proBNP mediated 4.305% of the effect of SBP TTR on HF or death risk (P=0.006), while eGFR mediated 3.489% (P=0.002). Conclusions Higher SBP TTR is independently associated with reduced HF risk, with this effect partially mediated by NT-proBNP and eGFR. These findings may support SBP TTR as a potential therapeutic target for HF prevention.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chen et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Heart failure risk (n=7,962). Higher SBP TTR (66% to 100%) vs. Lower SBP TTR (<66%) was evaluated on Heart failure risk (adjusted HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.56-0.98, p=0.034). Higher systolic blood pressure time in target range (66-100%) was associated with a lower risk of heart failure compared to <66% time in target range (adjusted HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.56-0.98; P=0.034).

synapsesocial.com/papers/698586388f7c464f2300a3aehttps://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf784.1405
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Systolic and diastolic blood pressure time in target range and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with hypertension and pre‐frailty or frailty status2024 · 11 citations
  2. 2Sustained control of systolic blood pressure and resting heart rate within target ranges improve cardiovascular outcomes in patients with hypertension2025
  3. 3Effect of Intensive Blood Pressure Control on Troponin and Natriuretic Peptide Levels: Findings From SPRINT2022 · 20 citations
  4. 4Systolic blood pressure time in target range and acute kidney injury in patients with hypertension2025
  5. 5Systolic blood pressure time-in-target range and kidney outcomes in patients with hypertension: Findings from the STEP trial2026