PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 6, 2026Journal of Clinical Medicine3 citationsOpen Access

Learning Curve of Da Vinci Xi Robotic Low Anterior Resection: A Cumulative Sum Analysis of a Single High-Volume Surgeon

View Full Paper
YTYu-Kang TsengFCFeng-Fan ChiangMCMing-Cheng Chen

Key Points

  • The study aims to define the learning curve and technical proficiency of a single surgeon performing robotic low anterior resection using the da Vinci Xi system.
  • Retrospective analysis of 95 patients undergoing robotic LAR for rectal malignancy from 2020 to 2023.
  • All surgeries were performed by a single surgeon using the da Vinci Xi system under a standardized ERAS protocol.
  • Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis of operative time was utilized to assess learning phases.
  • Proficiency inflection point identified after 16 cases.
  • Median docking time decreased significantly during proficiency phase (14.5 vs. 10.0 min, p < 0.01).
  • Zero conversions to open surgery occurred throughout the series.
  • Overall complication rates and postoperative length of stay were comparable between phases.
  • Short-term oncological quality metrics remained satisfactory in both groups.

Abstract

Background: The learning curve for robotic low anterior resection (LAR) utilizing the modern da Vinci Xi system within a high-volume, standardized environment remains poorly defined. This study aimed to delineate the technical proficiency of a single high-volume surgeon using the Xi platform. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 95 consecutive patients undergoing robotic LAR for primary rectal malignancy between 2020 and 2023 was conducted. All procedures were performed by a single surgeon using the da Vinci Xi system under a standardized ERAS protocol. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis of operative time was used to define learning phases. Results: CUSUM analysis identified a proficiency inflection point after 16 cases. Median docking time significantly decreased in the proficiency phase (14.5 vs. 10.0 min, p < 0.01). Notably, zero conversions to open surgery occurred throughout the series. Comparative analysis revealed comparable overall complication rates (0.0% vs. 13.9%, p = 0.201) and postoperative length of stay between phases. Short-term oncological quality, including lymph node yield and circumferential resection margins, remained satisfactory in both groups. Technical precision, reflected by consistently low robotic stapler firings (median 2.0), was maintained from the outset. Conclusions: Technical proficiency in robotic LAR using the da Vinci Xi system was rapidly achieved after approximately 16 cases in this high-volume standardized setting. This accelerated learning curve was not associated with compromised perioperative safety or oncological outcomes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tseng et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698586498f7c464f2300a513https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15031248
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper