PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 6, 2026IET Image Processing0 citationsOpen Access

AHD‐YOLO: An Adaptive Hybrid Dynamic Network for Building Damage Detection

View Full Paper
MLMin LiTXTao XuYJYinping Jiang

Key Points

  • The research aims to enhance building damage detection accuracy while reducing computational complexity using a new deep learning framework.
  • Developed AHD-YOLO based on the YOLOv11 architecture.
  • Introduced omni-dimensional dynamic fusion for feature extraction.
  • Implemented adaptive in-scale feature interaction for fine-grained damage detection.
  • Created a lightweight adaptive high-level screening feature fusion pyramid network.
  • Achieved 70.5% mAP, 60.2% Recall, and 48.2% mAP@0.5:0.95, with improvements over YOLOv11s.
  • Reduced parameters by 11.0% and GFLOPs by 13.0%.
  • Achieved 78.3% detection accuracy on structural damage, outperforming YOLOv11s by 2.7%.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Current deep learning‐based building damage detection methods often suffer from limited accuracy and high computational complexity. To address these limitations, we propose a novel framework based on the YOLOv11 architecture, termed adaptive hybrid dynamic YOLO (AHD‐YOLO). AHD‐YOLO introduces three key innovations. Omni‐dimensional dynamic fusion (ODFusion) enhances the adaptability and precision of feature extraction. Adaptive in‐scale feature interaction (AIFI) captures fine‐grained damage features. Adaptive high‐level screening feature fusion pyramid network (AHSFPN) emphasizes critical damage regions while maintaining a lightweight design. Experiments conducted on the building damage dataset show that AHD‐YOLO achieves 70.5% mAP, 60.2% Recall, and 48.2% mAP@0.5:0.95, representing respective improvements of 2.1%, 1.3%, and 1.7% over YOLOv11s. Moreover, the model also reduces the number of parameters and GFLOPs by 11.0% and 13.0%, respectively. Comparative experiments indicate that AHD‐YOLO outperforms current state‐of‐the‐art detection methods. In generalization tests on a structural damage dataset, the model achieves 78.3% detection accuracy, exceeding YOLOv11s by 2.7%. These results confirm that AHD‐YOLO effectively balances detection precision and computational efficiency, enabling accurate and real‐time identification of multiple damage types in practical building inspection scenarios.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698586498f7c464f2300a579https://doi.org/10.1049/ipr2.70298
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper