PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 11, 2026Pharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy0 citations

Development and Validation of a Time‐Dependent Nomogram for Predicting Hematological Toxicity Risk During Linezolid Therapy in Drug‐Resistant Tuberculosis

View Full Paper
WZWenqiang ZhouHZHui ZhuZLZhongquan Liu

Key Points

  • The aim was to create a nomogram to predict hematological toxicity risk in patients undergoing linezolid therapy for drug-resistant tuberculosis.
  • Developed a time-dependent nomogram based on a prospective cohort study
  • Included 201 DR-TB patients receiving linezolid (600 mg/day)
  • Measured blood trough concentration (C min ) and clinical variables
  • Used multivariable Cox regression to identify predictors of toxicity
  • Assessed model performance with calibration curves, C-index, and time-dependent AUC
  • Ninety-six patients (47.8%) experienced hematological adverse events
  • Key predictors included C min > 2.08 mg/L (HR = 2.87) and lower baseline white blood cells
  • Nomogram demonstrated good discrimination with a C-index of 0.73
  • Time-dependent AUCs were 0.74 at 1 month, 0.79 at 3 months, and 0.80 at 6 months
  • Bootstrapping confirmed the robustness of the nomogram

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Linezolid is essential for drug‐resistant tuberculosis (DR‐TB) treatment but causes frequent hematological toxicity. We developed a time‐dependent nomogram to predict this risk. Methods A prospective cohort of 201 patients with DR‐TB receiving linezolid (600 mg/day) was enrolled. Blood trough concentration (C min ) and clinical variables were measured. Multivariable Cox regression identified predictors, with a nomogram constructed to estimate toxicity probability at 1, 3, and 6 months. Model performance was assessed via calibration curves, C‐index, and time‐dependent area under the curve (AUC). Results Ninety‐six patients (47.8%) developed hematological adverse events (anemia: 26.4%, leukopenia: 14.4%, thrombocytopenia: 7.0%). Five predictors were significant: C min > 2.08 mg/L Hazard Ratio (HR) = 2.87, p < 0.001; lower baseline white blood cells (HR = 0.84, p = 0.003), hemoglobin (HR = 0.99, p = 0.033), and creatinine clearance rate (HR = 0.99, p = 0.001); and initial treatment (HR = 0.56 vs. retreatment, p = 0.011). The nomogram showed good discrimination (C‐index = 0.73) and calibration. Time‐dependent AUCs were 0.74 (1‐month), 0.79 (3‐month), and 0.80 (6‐month). Internal validation via bootstrapping (1000×) confirmed robustness. Conclusions This nomogram, integrating C min with baseline clinical factors, enables early identification of patients with DR‐TB at high risk for hematotoxicity and could guide pre‐emptive interventions. However, external validation is required to confirm its generalizability before widespread clinical implementation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhou et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698c1bcd267fb587c655dbcfhttps://doi.org/10.1002/phar.70109
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper