PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 14, 2026The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research0 citations

Uniform Neuromuscular Responses Across Varied Blood Flow Restriction Training Strategies

View Full Paper
MHMason A. HowardPRPaola M. RiveraSLSean M. Lubiak

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate neuromuscular responses during different blood flow restriction training protocols during resistance exercise.
  • Assessed responses during low-load blood flow restriction training with three protocols: 75-rep, 3 sets to failure (3×), and 1 set to failure (1×).
  • Participants completed unilateral, submaximal leg extensions at 30% of maximal voluntary contraction.
  • Used surface electromyography to measure muscle activity and analyze changes in amplitude and mean power frequency.
  • More repetitions were achieved in the 1× protocol compared to the 75-rep protocol and higher total repetitions in the 3× protocol than the 1×.
  • sEMG amplitude showed significant increases and then plateaued in both the 75-rep and 3× protocols after specified sets.
  • sEMG mean power frequency decreased after multiple sets but never exceeded changes seen in the 1× protocol.

Abstract

Abstract Howard, MA, Rivera, PM, Lubiak, SM, Proppe, CE, Schmidt, JT, Rolnick, N, Shobe, ED, Fraifer, TL, and Hill, EC. Uniform neuromuscular responses across varied blood flow restriction training strategies. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000–000, 2025—The purpose of this investigation was to assess neuromuscular responses during acute bouts of resistance exercise with low-load blood flow restriction (LLBFR) performed with a 75-repetition protocol (75-rep; 1 × 30, 3 × 15), 3 sets to failure (3×), and 1 set to failure (1×). Seventeen recreationally active females randomly completed 75-rep, 3×, and 1× protocols consisting of unilateral, submaximal (30% of maximal voluntary isometric contraction), isokinetic (90°·s −1 ), leg extension muscle actions. A greater number of repetitions were performed during set 1 of the 1× protocol (59.5 ± 35.1) compared with the 75-rep protocol (30.0 ± 0.0), and more total repetitions were performed in the 3× protocol (85.2 ± 42.2) compared with the 1× protocol (59.5 ± 35.1). Surface electromyographic (sEMG) amplitude (AMP) progressively increased and then plateaued after 2 sets for the 75-rep protocol (118.3 ± 31.4% to 185.9 ± 85.3%; p = 0.043) and after 1 set of the 3× protocol (119.6 ± 8.6% to 206.3 ± 84.1%; p = 0.003). In addition, sEMG mean power frequency (MPF) decreased and then plateaued after 3 sets of the 75-rep protocol (99.8 ± 3.5% to 88.8 ± 11.7%; p = 0.012) and after 1 set of the 3× protocol (101.0 ± 8.2% to 84.4 ± 18.9%; p < 0.001). The changes in sEMG AMP and sEMG MPF across multiple sets (i.e., 75-rep and 3×) never exceeded the changes observed after the 1× protocol. Despite variations in set and repetition schemes, performing just 1 set of LLBFR to failure was sufficient to maximize acute neuromuscular responses. This highlights the efficiency of a single-set LLBFR protocol as a time-effective option for athletes and practitioners.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Howard et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699010df2ccff479cfe57239https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000005311
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper