PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 14, 2026Symmetry0 citationsOpen Access

Research on Dynamic Contagion of Banking Risks and Identification of Systemically Important Institutions: Based on the HD-TVP-VAR-DY Model

CLCuicui LiuHMHubin MaZYZhou Yu

Key Points

  • The research aims to analyze how banking risks spread in China during and after COVID-19.
  • Analyzed daily closing prices of 25 banks over three periods: pre-, during-, and post-pandemic.
  • Employed the HD-TVP-VAR-DY model to evaluate risk dynamics.
  • Utilized dynamic topological directed networks to identify systemic core nodes.
  • Abrupt shocks increased systemic fragility significantly.
  • Identified primary risk transmitters varied across the pandemic periods: CCBs, JSCBs, and SOCBs.
  • Found interbank risk propagation evolved from concentrated to decentralized, then back to hierarchical patterns.

Abstract

This study focuses on analyzing the dynamic process, strength, and orientation of risk spillovers in the Chinese banking system under the exogenous shock of the COVID-19 pandemic. Using daily closing prices of 25 representative banks, it stratifies the data into three periods: pre-, during-, and post-pandemic. Employing the HD-TVP-VAR-DY model and dynamic topological directed networks, this study captures the time-varying heterogeneity of risk spillovers and identifies systemic core nodes. The findings reveal that abrupt shocks significantly exacerbate systemic fragility. The primary risk transmitters in the pre-, during-, and post-pandemic periods were CCBs, JSCBs, and CCBs, while SOCBs and RCBs were the main net risk recipients. The interbank risk propagation exhibits a structural evolution pattern of “Concentration–Decentralization–Reshaping.” In the pre-pandemic period, the network was highly concentrated, forming a directional connectedness structure from JSCBs to large banks. During the pandemic, the network underwent significant decentralization, with CMBC and SZRCB emerging as pivotal spillover sources; risk flows shifted from directional to systemic diffusion, characterized by passive absorption. Post-pandemic, the network reverted to a hierarchical-driven pattern, with BOC becoming the core risk source, and the propagation dynamics shifted from passive absorption back to active spillover dominance.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6990113f2ccff479cfe57caahttps://doi.org/10.3390/sym18020338
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper