PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 14, 2026Management Research Review0 citations

Well-being, parity and decent work: a meta-analytic review of psychological capital and employee well-being literature

View Full Paper
MMMujtaba MominKRKrishna Priya Rolla

Key Points

  • This research investigates how psychological capital influences employee well-being across various contexts.
  • Conducted a meta-analysis of findings from 5,169 respondents worldwide.
  • Analyzed literature published between 2016 and 2025.
  • Identified key authors, documents, and journals in the field.
  • A significant positive association between psychological capital and employee well-being was found.
  • The association is slightly stronger for women, indicating that gender moderates this relationship.
  • The findings emphasize the need for organizations to invest in psychological capital to enhance employee happiness.

Abstract

Purpose Psychological capital (Psycap) and employee well-being (EWB) have both been identified as constructs within positive psychology; however, there is a lack of detailed investigation that establish their relationship. This study aims to examine how Psycap affects EWB and ascertain the significance they hold for each other in diverse geographical and organizational contexts. This meta-analysis is a step toward accomplishing United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UN-SDGs) – 3, 5 and 8. Design/methodology/approach Using content and meta-analysis, this study combines findings from 5,169 respondents worldwide, published between 2016 and 2025. The comprehensive review analyzes academic literature by identifying key authors, documents, keywords and journals while examining existing literature and patterns. Findings The meta-analysis unanimously indicates a significant positive association between Psycap and EWB. The meta-method indicates that this primal association is moderated by gender; wherein the association becomes a little accentuated for women. This goes on to state that the association between Psycap and EWB shall be more meaningful in the case of women participants, though the increase is abysmal. This ascertains that gender is an essential indicator of moderating the Psycap–EWB relationship. Research limitations/implications The authors identify the association between Psycap and EWB to be mitigated by gender; future investigations need to substantiate this with perennial and consistent research Moreover, future aggregation studies may use other databases, such as Google Scholar and EBSCO, to increase the number of relevant articles. Conclusively, they can think of analyzing this association under qualitative parameters, like theoretical frameworks, region, industry and culture. Practical implications The current meta-analysis indicates that firms invest and analyze psycap of an employee, as this may lead to employee happiness, which is theoretically evinced to influence organizational and individual performance. Firms may also try to induct women employees, as the current meta-analysis is indicative of an accentuated feeling of well-being on the inducement of positive psycap. Specifically, the current investigations have broader implications for organizations and policymakers. Social implications The study is in sync with United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UN-SDG) 3 (well-being), UN-SDG 5 (gender parity) and UN-SDG 8 (decent work). Originality/value To the best of the authors' knowledge, the study is an initial meta-analysis that has triangulated previous research on Psycap and EWB, with major studies coming from the Asian context. Second, the current investigation has incorporated mixed empirical results, based on distinct variable measurements that rationalize the inferences considerably. Finally, this study excavates the relevance of moderating variables that offer significant cues for theory and practice.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Momin et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6990113f2ccff479cfe57cfchttps://doi.org/10.1108/mrr-05-2025-0411
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper