PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Neural Correlates of Dynamic Predictions and Prediction Errors in Response to Unexpected Silence and Sound.

View Full Paper
FAFabian AurichAWAndreas WidmannTDTjerk Dercksen

Key Points

  • The research examines the brain's ability to flexibly predict auditory outcomes, especially in response to unexpected sounds and omissions.
  • Participants pressed one of two buttons producing different sound frequencies
  • One button frequently produced sound (80%), the other often did not (80%)
  • Electroencephalogram (EEG) measured brain responses to unexpected sounds and omissions
  • Unexpected sounds produced a mismatch negativity (MMN) regardless of the expectation context
  • P3 components showed varying amplitudes based on sound predictions
  • Silence did not have a clear sensory representation at lower processing levels but emerged later

Abstract

To interact efficiently with our environment, our brain predicts the sensory effects of our actions and compares them with the actual outcomes. This allows us to adapt our actions when predictions and sensory outcomes mismatch. While this process is generally well understood for action-sound predictions, it is an open question whether these predictions can flexibly switch in frequently changing environments, as they occur in real life. To investigate the flexibility of top-down predictions, we asked participants (N = 41) to press one of two buttons, a left-hand and a right-hand button, and switch hands autonomously. One button frequently produced a sound (80%) and rarely no sound. The other button frequently generated no sound (80%) and rarely produced a sound. In a third, separate condition, each button produced a sound in 50% of the trials. Unexpected sounds and unexpected sound omissions elicited a series of error-related brain responses in the electroencephalogram (EEG) at different levels of auditory processing, including a mismatch negativity (MMN) and the P3 complex for unexpected sounds, and the oN1, oN2, and oP3 complex for unexpected omissions. Moreover, unexpected sounds elicited an equivalent MMN, regardless of whether silence was expected (80%) or no reliable expectation was possible (50%), while later P3 components showed different amplitudes. Our results demonstrate flexible action-sound predictions at sensory and higher cortical levels. Furthermore, they indicate that predicted silence does not have an explicit sensory representation at lower levels but emerges at later stages, when higher-level information has been integrated.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Aurich et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a3d8caec16d51705d2ffa0https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.70422
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper