PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 3, 2026IEEJ Transactions on Industry Applications0 citations

Comparative Analysis of Heat Dissipation Distribution in Double-Sided Cooling Si-IGBT and SiC-MOSFET Power Semiconductor Modules

View Full Paper
KYKan YasuiTMTakahiro MorikawaTKTakayuki Kushima

Key Points

  • This research aims to compare heat dissipation distribution in double-sided cooling Si-IGBT and SiC-MOSFET modules.
  • Fabrication of double-sided cooling power semiconductor modules
  • Comparison of heat dissipation distributions between Si-IGBT and SiC-MOSFET
  • Measurement of thermal resistance in different cooling configurations
  • Analysis of heat flux share from die to surface based on spacer area
  • The thermal resistance of the DSC Si-IGBT module was 0.121K/W, better than 0.139K/W for single-sided cooling
  • The DSC SiC-MOSFET module showed a thermal resistance of 0.124K/W despite a smaller die heat dissipation area
  • Si-IGBT had a heat flux share of 37.1%, while SiC-MOSFET had 29.7% from die to upper surface.

Abstract

A double-sided cooling (DSC) power semiconductor module embedded with a silicon insulated gate bipolar transistor (Si-IGBT) or silicon carbide metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor (SiC-MOSFET) was fabricated. Their heat dissipation distributions were compared, and the causes of the differences were analyzed. The thermal resistance of the indirect cooling DSC Si-IGBT module was 0.121K/W. It was better than the single-sided direct cooling module, which reported a thermal resistance of 0.139K/W. An indirect cooling DSC SiC-MOSFET module with dispersed placement for the same package exhibited an almost equivalent thermal resistance of 0.124K/W, despite possessing a smaller die heat dissipation area owing to its higher current density. Si-IGBT and SiC-MOSFET reported 37.1% and 29.7% of the heat flux share from the die to the upper surface, respectively. It was clarified that the share is determined by the ratio of the spacer area on the surface side to the die active area on the backside.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yasui et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a67e0ef353c071a6f09efehttps://doi.org/10.1541/ieejias.146.134
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper