PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 3, 2026Journal of Complex Networks0 citations

Efficiency and robustness of eigenvector methods for cluster detection in weighted networks

View Full Paper
DMDeivasundari MuthukumarABAtiyeh BayaniFNFahimeh Nazarimehr

Key Points

  • Laplacian spectral localization method shows superior accuracy in detecting cluster formations, revealing detailed synchronization patterns.
  • Accuracy evaluation revealed that the Laplacian method correctly predicts cluster composition, with significant improvements over the eigenvector centrality method.
  • Analytical approach using synchronization dynamics helps demonstrate the strengths of each method under varying noise conditions.
  • Findings suggest important guidelines for choosing effective cluster detection techniques in different noise environments.

Abstract

Abstract In this work, we compare two eigenvector-based approaches for detecting clusters in complex weighted networks: the Laplacian spectral localization method and the eigenvector centrality method. We apply both techniques to two representative networks and evaluate their outputs against synchronization dynamics to measure detection accuracy. We show that the Laplacian spectral localization method not only identifies cluster compositions but also predicts the sequence of cluster formation, providing deeper insight into the synchronization process. To structure the comparison, we proceed in two stages. First, we evaluate the structural accuracy of the detected clusters in the absence of noise and compare the results with the synchronization error, factor diagrams, and Hamiltonian energy. Second, we introduce slight noise into the adjacency matrix to test the robustness of each method under identical tolerance thresholds. Our results demonstrate that the Laplacian spectral localization method is able to capture intermediate synchronization patterns that the eigenvector centrality method misses and maintains reliable accuracy at higher noise intensities. These findings offer practical guidance for selecting suitable cluster detection techniques in both ideal and noisy network environments.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Muthukumar et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a75b3dc6e9836116a22351https://doi.org/10.1093/comnet/cnaf056
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Effects of network structure and node dynamics on synchronization with time delays2025 · 11 citations
  2. 2Graph partitions and cluster synchronization in networks of oscillators2016 · 147 citations
  3. 3Robustness and Complexity of Directed and Weighted Metabolic Hypergraphs2023 · 8 citations
  4. 4Community modularity structure promotes the evolution of phase clusters and chimeralike states2025 · 17 citations
  5. 5Multilayer networks with higher-order interaction reveal the impact of collective behavior on epidemic dynamics2022 · 39 citations