PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 3, 2026International Journal of Digital Humanities0 citationsOpen Access

Annotating, projecting, and interpreting named entities in digital scholarly editions with LLMs

View Full Paper
SGSelina GalkaGVGeorg Vogeler

Key Points

  • LLMs significantly enhance named entity recognition compared to traditional models, especially for complex references.
  • With over 97% accuracy, LLMs effectively project entity annotations between French and German texts.
  • Observational analysis using TEI/XML-encoded historical memoirs reveals strengths of LLMs over baseline frameworks.
  • Future work may enable better editing and indexing practices based on LLM error analysis and relationship modeling.

Abstract

This paper explores the use of large language models (LLMs) to enhance semantic annotation and annotation projection in digital scholarly editions (DSEs), focusing on historical ego-documents. Using the TEI/XML-encoded French memoirs of Countess Luise Charlotte of Schwerin (1684–1732) and their German translation as a case study, we evaluate LLMs for Named Entity Recognition (NER), annotation transfer across aligned bilingual texts, and the extraction of interpersonal relationships. A comparative analysis with a traditional NER framework shows that LLMs significantly outperform baseline models, particularly in recognizing complex person references, such as non-rigid designators and nested entities. For annotation projection, we demonstrate that LLMs can reliably transfer entity annotations between French and German texts without intermediate alignment layers, achieving over 97% of correct projected entities using zero-shot prompting. Additionally, a pilot experiment illustrates the potential of LLMs for structured relationship modeling. The analysis of the errors puts further emphasis on the question of our intentions as editors when translating and indexing texts.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Galka et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a75c4ec6e9836116a25100https://doi.org/10.1007/s42803-025-00114-8
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper